지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper aims to analyse the background and several important features of transition strategy of Kyrgyzstan in 1990s, and examine its positive and negative influences on the economic outcome in 1990s and 2000s. Based on the analysis, we can draw several lessons from the country’s radical transition strategy and evaluate its further prospect to the economic development.
The experience of the economic transition in Kyrgyzstan suggests us following several implications. Firstly, big bang approach chosen by the republic is difficult to be positively evaluated, at least, in regard of economic performance in 1990s. So it could be concluded that 'shock therapy’ was a bitter medicine and apparently caused destructive side effect, although it brought into early signal of economic recovery. Secondly, the Akaev’s government seized the power in 1990, dismantled the Soviet central commanding economy and made the reduction of state intervention to the economy, but it maintained strong organizational structure and power. So, it can suggest that, even if what kind of transition strategy would be chosen, there needed strong role of the government to maintain and realize its strategy. Thirdly, Kyrgyzstan applied a ‘big bang’ approach to its privatization program and implemented radical and rapid privatization. Kyrgyzstan’s experiences of unsuccessful privatized enterprises proved that it is important to create appropriate business environment and infrastructure. Fourthly, in case of Kyrgyzstan, international assistance was key factor to introduce economic reforms and implement macroeconomic stabilization. Additionally, the republic showed that it is almost impossible to attract large scale of foreign direct investment to transition economy without healthy control of the government on the macro-economic stabilization and the economy itself.
The experience of the economic transition in Kyrgyzstan suggests us following several implications. Firstly, big bang approach chosen by the republic is difficult to be positively evaluated, at least, in regard of economic performance in 1990s. So it could be concluded that 'shock therapy’ was a bitter medicine and apparently caused destructive side effect, although it brought into early signal of economic recovery. Secondly, the Akaev’s government seized the power in 1990, dismantled the Soviet central commanding economy and made the reduction of state intervention to the economy, but it maintained strong organizational structure and power. So, it can suggest that, even if what kind of transition strategy would be chosen, there needed strong role of the government to maintain and realize its strategy. Thirdly, Kyrgyzstan applied a ‘big bang’ approach to its privatization program and implemented radical and rapid privatization. Kyrgyzstan’s experiences of unsuccessful privatized enterprises proved that it is important to create appropriate business environment and infrastructure. Fourthly, in case of Kyrgyzstan, international assistance was key factor to introduce economic reforms and implement macroeconomic stabilization. Additionally, the republic showed that it is almost impossible to attract large scale of foreign direct investment to transition economy without healthy control of the government on the macro-economic stabilization and the economy itself.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 초기조건과 체제전환 전략의 선택
Ⅲ. 충격요법과 체제전환의 경로
Ⅳ. 포스트소비에트 시기의 경제실적
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
중앙아시아 영화의 발견, 키르기스스탄 영화 연구
세계문학비교연구
2019 .01
-
키르기즈스탄 공화국의 2010년 정치변동과 러시아 연방
슬라브학보
2010 .12
-
키르기스스탄 영화 연구: 동유럽 플랫폼 및 합작을 통해 소개된 작품들을 중심으로
동유럽발칸연구
2018 .01
-
Ошибочная политика Правительства РФ 90-х годов ⅩⅩ века как фактор инфляции
슬라브학보
2011 .03
-
체제이행 경제의 이행지표와 경제성과간의 상관관계 분석
슬라브학보
1997 .06
-
체제전환국의 경제자유화가 경제성장에 미친 영향에 대한 분석 : 중동부유럽과 유라시아 국가를 중심으로
슬라브학보
2015 .06
-
1950년대 김영선의 ‘자유경제’정책론 형성과 전개
동방학지
2019 .01
-
1955-1960년 김영선의 정치활동과 경제정책 실행방안 구상
민족문화연구
2019 .01
-
대한민국 정부수립 초기, 경제부흥계획의 성격
사학연구
2004 .03
-
Economic Development in Korea
Korea Journal
1966 .08
-
Economic Research Methods and Their Problems
Korea Journal
1979 .11
-
Economic Growth and Koreans` View of Economy
Korea Journal
1978 .04
-
산업화 이전의 한국경제 저발전에 관한 연구 : 문화적 접근을 중심으로
한국학(구 정신문화연구)
2001 .12
-
The Role of Government in Economic Management : Korea"s Experiences and Lessons
Korea Journal
1997 .12
-
지역 경제위기와 지역구조 조정
한국학논집
2006 .12
-
슬로바키아 체제전환의 제도주의적 고찰
슬라브학보
2020 .06
-
Transition of Thought in Modern Korea
Korea Journal
1968 .02
-
고바야시 다키지 「전형기의 사람들」의 조선인
인문학연구
2019 .06
-
글로벌경제의 대항 비전으로서 사회적 경제 : ‘경제의 지역화’, 로컬 경제운동과 관련하여
로컬리티 인문학
2010 .10
-
Korean Economy Described in Foreign Textbooks
THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES
2007 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2012-309-004152262