지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
‘Global warming’ and ‘climate change,’ allegedly aggravated as well as caused by the emission of so-called greenhouse gases and greenhouse effect, are becoming critical issues to be settled for the survival of all human beings and conservation of ecological system. Upon realizing the seriousness of global warming and climate change, international society established the so-called ‘international climate change regime’ based on the two major relevant conventions, ?United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change?(UNFCCC) and ?Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change?(Kyoto Protocol). These two international treaties respectively provide legal measures regarding states’ obligation to reduce the emission of greenhouse gases and prevent global warming and climate change.
However, in several respects, such as lack of effective implementation system, consensus of future duty to reduce the emission of greenhouse gases, practical means to claim state responsibility and so on, this treaty regime is still incomplete as a legal basis of states’ duty to prevent climate change. Accordingly, some questions have been raised, such as whether any other rule of international law applicable to the states’ duty to prevent climate change exists outside of the treaty regime and whether the existence of the treaty regime automatically excludes the application of relevant general international rule. The ‘No-harm Rule’ under customary international law is located in the center of these discussions. If this rule, along with the treaty regime, is applicable and effective as a direct legal basis for the states’ duty to prevent climate change, the defects of existing treaty regime will be significantly cured, as well as the legal framework of states’ prevention duty of and responsibility for climate change will be strengthened.
Based on this recognition, this paper, starting with the general overview of the existing climate change regime, not only reviewed the concept and legal status of the ‘No-harm Rule’ as an established principle under customary international law but also studied the applicability of the ‘No-harm Rule’ to the states’ prevention duty of and responsibility for climate change through the analysis of relationship between the existing treaty regime and the ‘No-harm Rule.’ Through this discussion, the author expects this paper can contribute to make the legal system concerning the states’ duty to prevent climate change stronger and more effective.
However, in several respects, such as lack of effective implementation system, consensus of future duty to reduce the emission of greenhouse gases, practical means to claim state responsibility and so on, this treaty regime is still incomplete as a legal basis of states’ duty to prevent climate change. Accordingly, some questions have been raised, such as whether any other rule of international law applicable to the states’ duty to prevent climate change exists outside of the treaty regime and whether the existence of the treaty regime automatically excludes the application of relevant general international rule. The ‘No-harm Rule’ under customary international law is located in the center of these discussions. If this rule, along with the treaty regime, is applicable and effective as a direct legal basis for the states’ duty to prevent climate change, the defects of existing treaty regime will be significantly cured, as well as the legal framework of states’ prevention duty of and responsibility for climate change will be strengthened.
Based on this recognition, this paper, starting with the general overview of the existing climate change regime, not only reviewed the concept and legal status of the ‘No-harm Rule’ as an established principle under customary international law but also studied the applicability of the ‘No-harm Rule’ to the states’ prevention duty of and responsibility for climate change through the analysis of relationship between the existing treaty regime and the ‘No-harm Rule.’ Through this discussion, the author expects this paper can contribute to make the legal system concerning the states’ duty to prevent climate change stronger and more effective.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 국제기후변화체제
Ⅲ. 국제관습법 상 ‘No-harm Rule’의 개념과 법적 지위
Ⅳ. 기후변화체제와 ‘No-harm Rule’의 관계
Ⅴ. ‘No-harm Rule’에 따른 기후변화 방지의무의 기준과 내용
Ⅵ. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
기후보호의 법적 과제 : 주요외국의 법제현황 및 우리의 입법방향
한양법학
2008 .06
-
우리나라 기후 변화 교육의 방향에 관한 고찰
환경교육
2010 .03
-
기후변화와 국가의 책임 : 최근 정부에 온실가스 감축 상향을 명한 네덜란드 판례를 중심으로
환경법과 정책
2015 .09
-
국제거래와 기후변화협약
경영법률
2009 .01
-
환경 교과서의 기후변화교육 내용 체계 및 내용 요소 재구조화
환경교육
2014 .06
-
초등학교 5, 6학년 사회 및 과학 교과서의 기후 변화 교육 내용 분석
환경교육
2014 .12
-
학교 기후 변화 교육의 현황과 과제
환경교육
2009 .06
-
中國의 에너지法制에 관한 연구
중국법연구
2011 .01
-
기후 변화 회의론에 대한 고찰과 기후 변화 교육의 함의
환경교육
2013 .03
-
“RULE OF LAW” AND DUTIES OF LAWYERS
저스티스
1963 .04
-
기후변화 대응 국제논의의 쟁점 및 국제법적 함의
서울국제법연구
2009 .12
-
녹색기후기금(GCF) 유치와 지속가능발전에 대한 연구
법과기업연구
2013 .06
-
초등학생의 기후변화에 대한 인식 및 태도 분석
에너지기후변화교육
2014 .01
-
기후변화대응 및 에너지 목표관리제하의 위험요인과 기회요인에 따른 가치관련성
경영학연구
2013 .10
-
국제하천의 비항행적 사용에 관한 국제법적 소고
국제법학회논총
2009 .12
-
개발도상국 개발협력에 대한 기후변화 통합화 방안 및 방글라데시의 적용 사례
환경정책
2011 .09
-
지구기후변화와 기업의 환경공시책임
경영법률
2011 .01
-
패권국의 국제법에 대한 딜레마 : 기후변화협약체제에 대한 미국의 정책
국제정치논총
2009 .03
-
WTO체제의 장래적 구제방식에 대한 비판적 고찰 : 소급적 구제의 필요성 및 당위성을 중심으로
서울국제법연구
2015 .06
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
기후변화 체제의 재정분야 쟁점과 녹색기후기금(GCF)의 역할 : 적응지원 역할강화를 중심으로
박시원
환경법과 정책
2014
.09
2020년 이후 기후변화체제를 규율하는 기본문서의 내용과 국제법적 성격
정민정
국제법학회논총
2014
.03
The International Climate Change Regime and Evolution of South Korea"s Climate Change Policy
Kyungjun Yun
,
Esook Yoon
환경정책
2016
.03
황사현상에 대한 국제법적 고찰
소병천
중앙법학
2003
.12
기후변화와 국가의 책임 : 최근 정부에 온실가스 감축 상향을 명한 네덜란드 판례를 중심으로
박시원
,
박태현
환경법과 정책
2015
.09
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-360-000490620