지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This research paper examines the evolution of ABCP issuance in Korea, the role of market participants, and the legal status of ABCP under the Bills Act and Capital market and Financial Investment Service Act. ABCP could be said that it is short-term liability issued by a ABCP vehicle. Types of ABCP conduits include multi-seller conduit, single seller conduit, and securities arbitrage conduit. A bank or other financial institution will always be involved in the process of creating ABCP. In particular, many ABCP vehicles had recourse to sponsor banks that set up these vehicles as off-balance sheet structures but provided them with liquidity and credit enhancements.
The outstanding of ABCP as a cash money market instrument, started in Korea in the late 1970 s and now its market developed. As The Capital market and Financial Investment Provider Act has enacted, the regulation on the operation of ABCP program is mostly abolished. Therefore, it is expected that ABCP program will be more popular and the industry could make diverse products based on portfolios backed by enormously complex financial derivatives. It will be creating what is a far riskier product that it had not been previously.
Now, many ordinary retail investors could get ABCP. Retail ABCP holders seemed to be conservative investors seeking safe vehicles for their money. ABCP notes, while highly rated by credit rating companies, do not guarantee that the principal could be returned. Their interest payments and return of principal depend on the performance of a portfolio of assets underlying the notes. For ABCP whose assets are more complex financial derivatives, it is apparently seemed to be safer, however it is not in reality. There are a form of guarantee of banks who are under contract to buy the paper from investors if nobody else would, but when the market freeze. However, most of the backing banks apt to use loophole in the contracts to avoid paying. Financial regulation makes rating decisions important in establishing what assets can be held by certain types of financial intermediaries. At the same time, rating agencies cannot be held legally accountable for their decisions because they claim that their ratings are only opinions and not accurate predictions of the risk of a given instrument. In selling the ABCP, brokers should do more to analyze and understand ABCP before recommending it to retail clients. However, the dealer views ABCP as cashable money market instrument that had obtained the highest possible credit rating. The regulator and investment dealers seem to have paid little or no attention to the underlying assets of the ABCP program. It is self-evident that if the investment dealers recommend unsuitable for financial consumers, it leads to liability on the part of investment dealers to any individual.
Recognized these problems, this study makes several recommendations relating to increasing product transparency, resolving of conflicts of interest, and strenthening disclosure of credit ratings.
The outstanding of ABCP as a cash money market instrument, started in Korea in the late 1970 s and now its market developed. As The Capital market and Financial Investment Provider Act has enacted, the regulation on the operation of ABCP program is mostly abolished. Therefore, it is expected that ABCP program will be more popular and the industry could make diverse products based on portfolios backed by enormously complex financial derivatives. It will be creating what is a far riskier product that it had not been previously.
Now, many ordinary retail investors could get ABCP. Retail ABCP holders seemed to be conservative investors seeking safe vehicles for their money. ABCP notes, while highly rated by credit rating companies, do not guarantee that the principal could be returned. Their interest payments and return of principal depend on the performance of a portfolio of assets underlying the notes. For ABCP whose assets are more complex financial derivatives, it is apparently seemed to be safer, however it is not in reality. There are a form of guarantee of banks who are under contract to buy the paper from investors if nobody else would, but when the market freeze. However, most of the backing banks apt to use loophole in the contracts to avoid paying. Financial regulation makes rating decisions important in establishing what assets can be held by certain types of financial intermediaries. At the same time, rating agencies cannot be held legally accountable for their decisions because they claim that their ratings are only opinions and not accurate predictions of the risk of a given instrument. In selling the ABCP, brokers should do more to analyze and understand ABCP before recommending it to retail clients. However, the dealer views ABCP as cashable money market instrument that had obtained the highest possible credit rating. The regulator and investment dealers seem to have paid little or no attention to the underlying assets of the ABCP program. It is self-evident that if the investment dealers recommend unsuitable for financial consumers, it leads to liability on the part of investment dealers to any individual.
Recognized these problems, this study makes several recommendations relating to increasing product transparency, resolving of conflicts of interest, and strenthening disclosure of credit ratings.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 현행 ABCP제도의 개요
Ⅲ. ABCP 관련 법규 현황 및 문제점
Ⅳ. ABCP의 발행 및 유통활성화ㆍ정상화를 위한 법적 정비과제
V. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (27)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
자산담보부 기업어음(ABCP) 매입약정이 BIS비율에 미치는 영향
[BOK] 금융시스템리뷰
2004 .07
-
사모 유동화거래시 사모주선인의 법적 지위와 책임에 관한 연구 - CERCG ABCP 사건에서 실사의무 및 선관의무를 중심으로 -
증권법연구
2019 .12
-
자본시장 통합법(안)상의 투자자 보호
기업법연구
2007 .06
-
일본 금융상품거래법의 주요 내용과 자본시장통합법의 과제
기업법연구
2008 .12
-
금융위기와 자본시장법 : 금융소비자보호를 중심으로
비교사법
2010 .03
-
국내 자본시장법제의 개선방향 - 자본시장법 개정안에 대한 의견을 중심으로 -
경영법률
2013 .01
-
금융소비자 보호와 자본시장법의 과제
기업법연구
2008 .12
-
자본시장법상 대주주 신용공여 금지 위반 사례연구
고려법학
2018 .01
-
자본시장법상의 금융소비자 보호
기업법연구
2010 .09
-
기업어음(CP)시장의 개편방안에 대한 법적 소고
증권법연구
2009 .12
-
운전자본과 고정자산 투자간의 관계
金融工學硏究
2008 .01
-
기업신용평가시스템을 위한 AHP 모형의 개발
경영과학
2003 .11
-
투자성향별 자산 배분행태에 관한 연구 - 은행 PB고객을 중심으로 -
부동산학연구
2014 .01
-
The needs of financial derivatives under new financial environment
전문경영인연구
1998 .01
-
전라북도 지역중소기업의 주거래은행 분석
지역사회연구
2007 .12
-
Potential Risks due to Expansion in Financial Investment Product Market
[BOK] Financial Stability Report
2015 .08
-
자본시장통합법 시행과 영향
산업경제연구
2010 .10
-
The Impact of Financial Crisis on the Financial Asset in California Hospitals
Korea and the World Economy
2015 .04
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-360-000498313