지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In Korea, German system of constitutional court was established in 1987 and it is now very successful. For the last 20 years, the number of laws rejected by the constitutional court is 128 (as of May 31st, 2009). However, there are only 6 laws which were subjected to breaches of the Constitution during 60 years in the Supreme Court after constitutional regime since 1946. This statement will focus on the cause of this phenomenon, whether this inactivity is based on problems of this system, or there are other reasons.
Currently in Japan, some people argue that debate on establishment of constitutional court is merely a trick to a hidden purpose, which is to have the ‘revision of article 9 of the Constitution’. However, during the last 60 years there have only been 6 cases of rejected laws which clearly implies disfunctional status of the system of constitutional suit in Japan. To be able to fix this, many people argue that the constitutional court must be established throughout the constitutional revision.
The supporters of ‘establishment of constitutional court’ speaks of it as it will a solution for all problems of constitutional suit system in Japan, just like in Korea. But the success of the system of constitutional court in Korea is not only based on its systematic reasons, but also the democracy movement deeply rooted in social background. To make a certain system function well in a society, the excellence of the system is required but the most crucial point is the willingness of the citizens.
This paper will observe the cause of biggest problem of the system of Constitutional suit in Japan and analyze as well as to review the systematic, social and political reason in its background. Also it will focus on the cause and problems of ‘Debate on establishment of Constitutional court’ which has come in earnest since 1994 as well as to find out if the ‘establishment of constitutional court’ can provide solution to judicial passivism in Japan. And amongst the opinions to improve the system of Constitutional suit in Japan, this paper will concentrate on how revision of the law instead of Constitutional revision can provide solutions to such problems of the system of Constitutional suit.
Currently in Japan, some people argue that debate on establishment of constitutional court is merely a trick to a hidden purpose, which is to have the ‘revision of article 9 of the Constitution’. However, during the last 60 years there have only been 6 cases of rejected laws which clearly implies disfunctional status of the system of constitutional suit in Japan. To be able to fix this, many people argue that the constitutional court must be established throughout the constitutional revision.
The supporters of ‘establishment of constitutional court’ speaks of it as it will a solution for all problems of constitutional suit system in Japan, just like in Korea. But the success of the system of constitutional court in Korea is not only based on its systematic reasons, but also the democracy movement deeply rooted in social background. To make a certain system function well in a society, the excellence of the system is required but the most crucial point is the willingness of the citizens.
This paper will observe the cause of biggest problem of the system of Constitutional suit in Japan and analyze as well as to review the systematic, social and political reason in its background. Also it will focus on the cause and problems of ‘Debate on establishment of Constitutional court’ which has come in earnest since 1994 as well as to find out if the ‘establishment of constitutional court’ can provide solution to judicial passivism in Japan. And amongst the opinions to improve the system of Constitutional suit in Japan, this paper will concentrate on how revision of the law instead of Constitutional revision can provide solutions to such problems of the system of Constitutional suit.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 일본국헌법상 헌법재판제도의 문제점
Ⅲ. 일본의 위헌판결의 역사
Ⅳ. 헌법재판소 설치론에 대한 각계의 동향
Ⅴ. 헌법재판소 설치론의 논거
Ⅵ. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (46)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
헌법정책적 측면에서 헌법재판소와 법원의 관계
헌법판례연구
2010 .02
-
헌법재판소법의 문제점과 개선방안
공법학연구
2005 .02
-
제3기 헌법재판소와 정치적 사건, 그리고 소수자의 인권
서강법학
2008 .06
-
헌법의 자기보장규범성에 관한 검토 : 데릴 레빈슨의 공공선택이론을 중심으로
한양법학
2013 .11
-
업무방해죄의 적용에 관한 헌법적 고찰 : 헌법재판소 결정의 규범적 이해
노동법학
2010 .06
-
2008年의 重要 憲法判例
헌법판례연구
2009 .02
-
Constitutional Principles
유럽연구
2007 .08
-
법원의 헌법재판
공법학연구
2014 .02
-
2010년도 헌법판례의 동향
헌법판례연구
2011 .03
-
권한쟁의심판과 기관소송의 관계정립 방안
한양법학
2008 .02
-
지방자치단체의 헌법소원 도입방안
한양법학
2018 .11
-
헌법재판 30년과 노동권 보장
저스티스
2019 .02
-
獨逸 聯邦憲法裁判所와 美國 聯邦大法院의 違憲審査基準論
헌법판례연구
2008 .02
-
Constitutional Review and Its Procedures
법학논총
2010 .02
-
사법적(司法的) 결정의 정치적 작용 : 헌법재판소의 정당 관련 결정에 대한 비판적 재검토
동아법학
2013 .08
-
헌법과 정치
유럽헌법연구
2020 .01
-
헌법재판에서의 헌법 또는 법률의 해석·적용
원광법학
2010 .01
-
The Basic Principles of Constitutional Adjudication in S. Korea
공법학연구
2006 .11
-
2007年度 憲法判例의 動向
헌법판례연구
2008 .02
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-360-000498464