메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
정혜인 (한양대학교)
저널정보
한양법학회 한양법학 한양법학 제28집
발행연도
2009.11
수록면
157 - 183 (27page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
In Korea, German system of constitutional court was established in 1987 and it is now very successful. For the last 20 years, the number of laws rejected by the constitutional court is 128 (as of May 31st, 2009). However, there are only 6 laws which were subjected to breaches of the Constitution during 60 years in the Supreme Court after constitutional regime since 1946. This statement will focus on the cause of this phenomenon, whether this inactivity is based on problems of this system, or there are other reasons.
Currently in Japan, some people argue that debate on establishment of constitutional court is merely a trick to a hidden purpose, which is to have the ‘revision of article 9 of the Constitution’. However, during the last 60 years there have only been 6 cases of rejected laws which clearly implies disfunctional status of the system of constitutional suit in Japan. To be able to fix this, many people argue that the constitutional court must be established throughout the constitutional revision.
The supporters of ‘establishment of constitutional court’ speaks of it as it will a solution for all problems of constitutional suit system in Japan, just like in Korea. But the success of the system of constitutional court in Korea is not only based on its systematic reasons, but also the democracy movement deeply rooted in social background. To make a certain system function well in a society, the excellence of the system is required but the most crucial point is the willingness of the citizens.
This paper will observe the cause of biggest problem of the system of Constitutional suit in Japan and analyze as well as to review the systematic, social and political reason in its background. Also it will focus on the cause and problems of ‘Debate on establishment of Constitutional court’ which has come in earnest since 1994 as well as to find out if the ‘establishment of constitutional court’ can provide solution to judicial passivism in Japan. And amongst the opinions to improve the system of Constitutional suit in Japan, this paper will concentrate on how revision of the law instead of Constitutional revision can provide solutions to such problems of the system of Constitutional suit.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 일본국헌법상 헌법재판제도의 문제점
Ⅲ. 일본의 위헌판결의 역사
Ⅳ. 헌법재판소 설치론에 대한 각계의 동향
Ⅴ. 헌법재판소 설치론의 논거
Ⅵ. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract

참고문헌 (46)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-360-000498464