메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
김상태 (서울대학교)
저널정보
한양법학회 한양법학 한양법학 제22집
발행연도
2008.2
수록면
163 - 180 (18page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
As the means of the dispute suit for resolving the competence dispute among agents in our country, there are the judgement on competence dispute as the constitutional suit and the agent suit as the administrative suit. By the way, the judgment on competence dispute in our country fundamentally has no difference with the agent suit which is achieved with the basis of the legal relation in principle because it includes not only the problems of constitutional law but also the wide legal problems. Like the above, because the distinction between both is vague, the present law system inevitably placed the proviso article of the Item 4 at the Article 3 in the Administrative Suit Law to clarify the jurisdiction of both. Nevertheless, regarding to the relation between both, the problems are still not settled. problems cannot be regarded to have been clearly established. That is why there is still the competitive problem of both’s jurisdiction at the present laws and also it is not reasonable that the Constitutional Court which has to protect the constitutional order and perform the unified interpretation of the constitution deals with the not-constitutional problems. At last, it is thought that the competence dispute related to the not-constitutional problem is reasonable to be settled by the agent suit which is under the jurisdiction of the general court. To settle this problem, the constitutional dispute and the not-constitutional dispute should be classified and the relevant legal system should be changed that the former is under the jurisdiction of the Constitutional Court and the latter is under the jurisdiction of the general court. If it is difficult to distinct the constitutional dispute and the not-constitutional dispute, it is reasonable to determine the jurisdiction after the council between the Constitutional Court and the Supreme Court is organized.

목차

Ⅰ. 들어가는 말
Ⅱ. 권한쟁의심판과 기관소송의 구별
Ⅲ. 권한쟁의심판과 기관소송간 발생되는 문제점
Ⅳ. 권한쟁의심판과 기관소송의 관계정립 방안
Ⅴ. 나가는 말
【참고문헌】
【Abstract】

참고문헌 (20)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-360-000705993