지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
It is true that every country which includes the developing country has planned own economic development through government subsidies. Korea also has developed their some major industry through supporting government subsidies. Under the WTO structure, however, government’s specific supports for export firms come under prohibited subsidy and subsidy supporting must be based on WTO ASCM(Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures).
The purpose of this paper was to study on the WTO ASCM and to analyze cases on the shipbuilding and Hynix DRAM dispute which Korean concerned major subsidy issue. Korea has been undergoing subsidy dispute with EU and U.S.A. concerned matter of shipbuilding and Hynix DRAM respectively.
From this research results were as follow：
First of all, the WTO ASCM introduced a definition of subsidy and divided subsidies into three categories and was legally bound through dispute settlement mechanism and implemented by all WTO members. Also, through analyzing cases, results were indicated that Korea wins a lawsuit against the matter of shipbuilding subsidy whereas losing the lawsuit against the matter of DRAM subsidy. It means that the case of shipbuilding subsidy do not violation WTO ASCM and the case of Hynix DARAM is against WTO ASCM. Additionally, as we see the dispute cases concerned Korean industry, it is necessary that government should operate subsidies which were provided for certain governmental policy as consisted with WTO ASCM.
The purpose of this paper was to study on the WTO ASCM and to analyze cases on the shipbuilding and Hynix DRAM dispute which Korean concerned major subsidy issue. Korea has been undergoing subsidy dispute with EU and U.S.A. concerned matter of shipbuilding and Hynix DRAM respectively.
From this research results were as follow：
First of all, the WTO ASCM introduced a definition of subsidy and divided subsidies into three categories and was legally bound through dispute settlement mechanism and implemented by all WTO members. Also, through analyzing cases, results were indicated that Korea wins a lawsuit against the matter of shipbuilding subsidy whereas losing the lawsuit against the matter of DRAM subsidy. It means that the case of shipbuilding subsidy do not violation WTO ASCM and the case of Hynix DARAM is against WTO ASCM. Additionally, as we see the dispute cases concerned Korean industry, it is necessary that government should operate subsidies which were provided for certain governmental policy as consisted with WTO ASCM.
목차
Abstract
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. WTO 보조금 협정의 의의와 분석
Ⅲ. WTO 보조금 분쟁사례 분석
Ⅳ. 결론
참고문헌
참고문헌 (12)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
한ㆍEU 조선산업 보조금분쟁에 관한 연구
무역학회지
2003 .09
-
우리나라 어업용 면세유의 WTO 보조금협정 적합성에 관한 연구
法學論文集
2007 .01
-
WTO 보조금 분쟁을 대비한 수출신용제도 운영방안에 관한 연구
무역상무연구
2013 .02
-
미국의 면화보조금에 대한 WTO 평결
행정법연구
2009 .12
-
WTO 補助金 및 相計措置協定의 分析과 爭點事項
통상법률
2002 .10
-
지방자치단체 보조금 제도의 효율적 운영방안
경기연구원 기본연구
2010 .12
-
WTO Rules of Agriculture Subsidies and the Development
국제법학회논총
2012 .03
-
WTO 체제하에서 중국의 현행 농업보조금제도에 관한 연구
중국법연구
2009 .01
-
EXPORT SUBSIDY COMPETITION AND THE WTO AGREEMENT
Journal of Economic Development
2003 .01
-
WTO협정, 주요국 농업보조금 현황과 과제
무역연구
2016 .01
-
WTO 농업보조금 분쟁사례 분석과 시사점
한국농촌경제연구원 정책연구보고
2013 .06
-
농산물 수출에서 물류비 보조금의 효과
해운물류연구
2018 .01
-
국가보조금 부정수급에 대한 형법적 고찰
법학연구
2016 .08
-
DDA 수산보조금 논의 현황에 대한 검토 : 법률적 이슈를 중심으로
국제법학회논총
2009 .12
-
WTO 보조금 협정상의 보조금과 농업협정상의 보조금의 상호관계 고찰 : 미국 면화보조금 사건에 대한 분석을 중심으로
국제경제법연구
2006 .12
-
Regulation of “Environmentally Harmful Subsidies” in the WTO : A Case Study of Fisheries Subsidies and the “Chair’s Text”
국제경제법연구
2013 .03
-
Analysis of the Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures(SCM Agreement), WTO
강원법학
2005 .12
-
The effects of export logistics cost subsidies on the exports in the agricultural industry of Korea
한국무역학회 국제학술대회
2017 .11
-
국가연구개발사업과 WTO 보조금협정의 조화방안 연구
과학기술법연구
2017 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
WTO 보조금 협정과 경제적 혜택
이재민
,
유광혁
국제경제법연구
2011
.05
WTO보조금협정 상 시장비교기준(market benchmark)법리의 내용 및 한계 : 관련시장(relevant market)의 획정문제를 중심으로
유광혁
국제법학회논총
2013
.06
분쟁해결사례로 본 WTO의 해석논리와 한계 : 미․EU간 민간 항공기 분쟁 사례를 중심으로
김은영
관세학회지
2011
.12
보조금협정으로 분석한 이산화탄소배출권
박지현
국제경제법연구
2011
.05
한ㆍEU 조선통상분쟁 사례연구 : EU의 WTO 제소를 중심으로
이종원
무역학회지
2003
.04
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-326-000783159