지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2010.6
- 수록면
- 507 - 564 (58page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
After the end of World War Ⅱ, there is not yet any international in-depth discussion on issues of Japan"s compensations for Asian victims of the Pacific War. Although it is 65 years that Korea was liberated from Japanese imperial regime, there were not yet so much remarkable achievements concerning Japan"s liability for postwar state compensations. It is really unfortunate that there is not yet any full-scale study on aspects of private international law concerning such liability, although there has been steadily a series of discussions on postwar state compensation from the perspective of international law.
Therefore, this study seeks to make general examinations into postwar state compensation from the perspectives of private international law. In the same context, it also intends to make a further analysis on Japanese courts" conventional postwar judgments on compensation for Chinese and Philippine victims of the Pacific War, so that it points out issues of existing judicial precedents concerning such compensation. In addition, this study seeks to address a variety of jurisprudential hypotheses concerning postwar state compensation, so that it may make a good chance to have a correct understanding about their rationales and limitations. On the other hand, this study adopts a perspective of comparative law to examine relevant legislations and judicial cases published in the United States, Germany, Austria, Japan and Korea, so that it may clearly identify the points in question concerning the determination of proper law on postwar state compensation.
Furthermore, this study deals extensively with issues in intertemporal law beyond a boundary of piecemeal studies from the perspective of private international law, so that it may explore possible ways to resolve the question of temporal conflict as a challenging question out of resolution simply relying on the current system of private international law. In other words, this study seeks to clearly identify possible common and different points among private international law, intertemporal law and intersystematical law, and determine possible relationships between international law and prescriptive regulations. In addition, this study deals with characterization of legal matters in intertemporal law as well as issues of public policy with regard to relationships with postwar state compensation, so that it may attempt to re-construe major topics in private international law with regard to relationships with intertemporal law.
Summing up, the further examinations hereof into postwar state compensation from the perspective private international law demonstrate that legislations and jurisprudential hypotheses across countries are generally based on lex loci delicti commissi in the determination of proper law. In reality, however, postwar state compensation involves a lot of issues requiring resolution, such as matters of intertemporal law and the correction of extinctive prescription system as a controversial question of international law. Hence, it is required for follow-up studies to take more multilateral and comprehensive perspectives to pose questions on postwar state compensation than now.
Therefore, this study seeks to make general examinations into postwar state compensation from the perspectives of private international law. In the same context, it also intends to make a further analysis on Japanese courts" conventional postwar judgments on compensation for Chinese and Philippine victims of the Pacific War, so that it points out issues of existing judicial precedents concerning such compensation. In addition, this study seeks to address a variety of jurisprudential hypotheses concerning postwar state compensation, so that it may make a good chance to have a correct understanding about their rationales and limitations. On the other hand, this study adopts a perspective of comparative law to examine relevant legislations and judicial cases published in the United States, Germany, Austria, Japan and Korea, so that it may clearly identify the points in question concerning the determination of proper law on postwar state compensation.
Furthermore, this study deals extensively with issues in intertemporal law beyond a boundary of piecemeal studies from the perspective of private international law, so that it may explore possible ways to resolve the question of temporal conflict as a challenging question out of resolution simply relying on the current system of private international law. In other words, this study seeks to clearly identify possible common and different points among private international law, intertemporal law and intersystematical law, and determine possible relationships between international law and prescriptive regulations. In addition, this study deals with characterization of legal matters in intertemporal law as well as issues of public policy with regard to relationships with postwar state compensation, so that it may attempt to re-construe major topics in private international law with regard to relationships with intertemporal law.
Summing up, the further examinations hereof into postwar state compensation from the perspective private international law demonstrate that legislations and jurisprudential hypotheses across countries are generally based on lex loci delicti commissi in the determination of proper law. In reality, however, postwar state compensation involves a lot of issues requiring resolution, such as matters of intertemporal law and the correction of extinctive prescription system as a controversial question of international law. Hence, it is required for follow-up studies to take more multilateral and comprehensive perspectives to pose questions on postwar state compensation than now.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 학설의 유형
Ⅲ. 비교법적 검토
Ⅳ. 시제법상의 문제점
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (149)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
WHAT IS LAW
저스티스
1965 .04
-
당사자자치의 원칙과 불통일법국법의 지정 -유럽국제사법상의 논의와 우리나라 국제사법에의 시사점-
국제사법연구
2019 .12
-
國家賠償法上 몇 가지 問題點
공법학연구
2002 .11
-
국제법상 시제법의 이론과 실제
국제법학회논총
2008 .04
-
'법의 일반원칙' 개념의 변천에 관한 일고찰 - 국제사법의 유추에서 국내공법의 유추로 -
아주법학
2011 .01
-
21世紀의 韓國-國際秩序의 理解와 國際法의 實踐
법학논집
1996 .01
-
한·중 환경기본법 비교 : 중국의 「환경보호법」을 중심으로
중앙법학
2009 .08
-
사회과 법교육에 있어서 국제법 교육의 실태와 대안 탐색에 관한 연구
사회과교육
2004 .03
-
국제 혼인 및 이혼사건의 처리에 대하여
法學論文集
2009 .01
-
환경 보호 메커니즘에 대한 법적 고찰
아주법학
2011 .01
-
국제적 근로관계에 관한 준거법 결정에 대한 시론
노동법포럼
2017 .07
-
공법과 사법 구분의 기원 · 변천 및 당위체계에 관한 연구 : 금전급부 8 유형론의 구체적 실례 및 그 정리와 해결을 중심으로
저스티스
2015 .10
-
중국의 “涉外民事關係法律適用法”상 무역계약의 준거법 선택 및 결정에 관한 연구
무역학회지
2012 .02
-
근로계약의 준거법에 관한 연구 : 유럽연합에서의 논의를 중심으로
비교사법
2018 .08
-
Glocalisation(국제화와 지방화)시대에 대비한 로스쿨 설치의 기본방향
노동법논총
2005 .12
-
법경제학 국제법 방법론에 관한 연구
한양법학
2011 .02
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-360-001270962