메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
조광국 (아주대학교)
저널정보
국어교육학회 국어교육연구 국어교육연구 제50집
발행연도
2012.2
수록면
325 - 352 (28page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
In this paper, complementary directions are proposed in practice, to solve the problems in learning activities. That learning activities had been devised, according to the commentary book on Korean high school education course which was revised in 2009 year. Especially problems in learning activities are focused on critically and creatively rewriting and rebuilding the original work. Complementary directions are three.
First, the parody-practice in high school literature-textbooks inclines toward imitation parody. The parody has an inclination of both imitation and criticism(or ridicule). To balance the parody-practice in high school literature-text, Papers in the field of literature education were accepted.
Second, the parody-practice in high school literature-texbooks inclines has the risk to breed plagiarism inadvertently because high school literature textbook did not provid the learning activities of identifying plagiarism and parody. In order to improve the problem, learning activities are designed for plagiarism. In addition, the legal firing incident with parody was dealt, for the purpose of strengthening parody activities.
Third, all high school literature-texbooks has not practice to understand mutual relationship between the original and the parody text, and to understand creativity of parody. In order to improve that problem, I suggested to strengthen parody-practice to understand mutual relationship and creativity of parody.

목차

Ⅰ. 문제 제기
Ⅱ. 패러디 활동의 문제점
Ⅲ. 패러디 활동의 개선 방향
Ⅳ. 결론
참고문헌
[Abstract]

참고문헌 (7)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-710-001558996