메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
조용철 (전남대학교) 김호군 (전남대학교) 허정욱 (전남대학교) 주재균 (전남대학교) 김형록 (전남대학교)
저널정보
대한외과학회 Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research 대한외과학회지 Vol.75 No.3
발행연도
2008.9
수록면
184 - 190 (7page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Purpose: The preoperative assessments of the depth of invasion in the rectal wall and the presence of lymph node metastasis are very important in determining the proper treatment modality for rectal cancer. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the accuracy of transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) for preoperatively staging rectal cancer, as compared with computerized tomography (CT).
Methods: 62 patients who were diagnosed with rectal cancer were staged by using TRUS and CT, preoperatively. The ultrasnonographic tumor stage (uT), the US nodal stage (uN) and the computerized tomographic tumor stage (cT) and the CT nodal (cN) stage were investigated. The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, PPV (Positive predictive value) and NPV (Negative predictive value) were calculated and compared with the pathologic staging.
Results: The accuracies of TRUS and CT in assessing the depth of rectal wall invasion were 82.2% and 79.0%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of TRUS were 68.1%, 81.9%, 70.4% and 85.4% and those of CT were 53.2%, 78.9%, 73.7% and 80.7%, respectively. The sensitivity of T1 was 77.8% with using TRUS and 33.3% with using CT, respectively. The incidence of over- and under-staging was 17.8% and 9.7% with using TRUS and 25.8% and 6.5% with using CT, respectively. The accuracies of TRUS and CT in assessing the involvement of lymph nodes were 62.4% and 68.8%, respectively. The incidence of over-staging for TRUS and CT was 41.9% and 21.0%, respectively. The incidence of under-staging for TRUS and CT was 20.1% and 25.8%, respectively. There was no meaningful factor influencing the accuracy of TRUS.
Conclusion: TRUS is very useful tool for the preoperative assessment of the depth of rectal cancer invasion. However, the evaluation of lymph node involvement by TRUS has limitations.

목차

서론
방법
결과
고찰
결론
REFERENCES

참고문헌 (28)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-514-002689983