지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The Daehan(“Great Han”) Empire, with jurisdiction over the islands of Ulleung-do and Dok-do officialized with Imperial order No. 41 issued in 1900, reinforced its management of the area by replacing the existing Dogam office with a “Gunsu” official. Smuggling materials in and out of the area was banned, and Japanese people settled there illegally were expelled as well.
The Japan government, determined to nullify such banning and prevent expulsion, argued that unofficial trades in the regions were ‘necessary ones as they were required by both parties[Korean residents and Japanese immigrants] for survival,’ and the Korean Dogam figure’s collection of taxes from the Japanese was an act of legalizing the Japanese presence there. Japan’s strategy was to let their own people go over to the area in a gradual fashion, form a collective presence there after some passage of time, and then dispatch a representative to the area as well as establish an administrative structure there in the name of protecting those people, effectively rendering the region placed under Japanese protection. It was a typical ploy on their part of expanding territory, as we can see they were trying to annex not only Dok-do but Ulleung-do as well.
Ulleung-do was not a trade region in the first place, so for the region to conduct trades with foreigners was illegal to begin with. The Daehan Empire had to consider the Japanese presence there as an unlawful occupation of the area, and could not allow their activities. But the Korean residents in the region, including the Dogam figure who was in charge of caring for them, were conducting unauthorized trades with the Japanese, and the Dogam figure was even illegally collecting taxes from the Japanese residents. Facing the situation, the Daehan Empire decided to publicly acknowledge the Dogam figure’s action of levying taxes upon the ‘Japanese squatters,’ and announced that such tax was essentially a ‘fine’ required upon the Japanese who were engaged in illegal trades in a no-trade zone. The fact that the Japanese people were paying prices for their fishing and trading business in the vicinity of Ulleung-do and Dok-do, should be used as a basis to rebut Japan’s groundless argument of having had jurisdiction over the Dok-do island.
The Japan government, determined to nullify such banning and prevent expulsion, argued that unofficial trades in the regions were ‘necessary ones as they were required by both parties[Korean residents and Japanese immigrants] for survival,’ and the Korean Dogam figure’s collection of taxes from the Japanese was an act of legalizing the Japanese presence there. Japan’s strategy was to let their own people go over to the area in a gradual fashion, form a collective presence there after some passage of time, and then dispatch a representative to the area as well as establish an administrative structure there in the name of protecting those people, effectively rendering the region placed under Japanese protection. It was a typical ploy on their part of expanding territory, as we can see they were trying to annex not only Dok-do but Ulleung-do as well.
Ulleung-do was not a trade region in the first place, so for the region to conduct trades with foreigners was illegal to begin with. The Daehan Empire had to consider the Japanese presence there as an unlawful occupation of the area, and could not allow their activities. But the Korean residents in the region, including the Dogam figure who was in charge of caring for them, were conducting unauthorized trades with the Japanese, and the Dogam figure was even illegally collecting taxes from the Japanese residents. Facing the situation, the Daehan Empire decided to publicly acknowledge the Dogam figure’s action of levying taxes upon the ‘Japanese squatters,’ and announced that such tax was essentially a ‘fine’ required upon the Japanese who were engaged in illegal trades in a no-trade zone. The fact that the Japanese people were paying prices for their fishing and trading business in the vicinity of Ulleung-do and Dok-do, should be used as a basis to rebut Japan’s groundless argument of having had jurisdiction over the Dok-do island.
목차
머리말
1. 대한제국의 울릉도에 대한 정책과 관리
2. 울릉도를 둘러싼 한일 간의 갈등과 정부의 대응
3. 울릉도 파견관원의 실상과 도민과의 관계
4. 일본의 세력확대와 자원침탈에 대한 인식
맺음말
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (8)
참고문헌 신청
1. [단행본] - 송병기 / 2010 / 울릉도와 독도, 그 역사적 검증 / 역사공간
2. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 김종준 / 2013 / 개항기 일본 상인의 울릉도 침탈과 염상 김두원 사건 / 동북아역사논총 (42) : 113 ~ 143
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 김호동 / 2011 / 독도와 울릉도를 둘러싼 러･일의 각축과 조선의 대응 / 獨島硏究 10
4. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 김호동 / 2013 / 「鬱島郡節目」을 통해 본 1902년대의 울릉도 사회상 / 藏書閣 30 (30) : 110 ~ 143
7. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 장영숙 / 2011 / 일제강점기 역사지리서에 반영된 울릉도 및 독도 인식 / 한국민족운동사연구 (67) : 341 ~ 369
2. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 김종준 / 2013 / 개항기 일본 상인의 울릉도 침탈과 염상 김두원 사건 / 동북아역사논총 (42) : 113 ~ 143
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 김호동 / 2011 / 독도와 울릉도를 둘러싼 러･일의 각축과 조선의 대응 / 獨島硏究 10
4. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 김호동 / 2013 / 「鬱島郡節目」을 통해 본 1902년대의 울릉도 사회상 / 藏書閣 30 (30) : 110 ~ 143
7. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 장영숙 / 2011 / 일제강점기 역사지리서에 반영된 울릉도 및 독도 인식 / 한국민족운동사연구 (67) : 341 ~ 369
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
19세기 후반 일본 어민의 동해 밀어와 조선인의 대응- 울릉도·독도를 중심으로 -
역사문화연구
2015 .01
-
Japanese Trade in Environmental Goods
대한일어일문학회 학술대회 발표논문 요지집
2016 .04
-
韓国大学生が関心を持つ日本の「文化」
日本語敎育
2019 .01
-
일제강점기 國語讀本과 차별적 위계 교육
문학교육학
2015 .01
-
행위를 중심으로 한 언어·문화의 통합적 수업활동 - 초급 일본어 수업의 시도 -
일본문화학보
2021 .05
-
일본이 식민지에서 자행한 국어상용화 정책에 관한 일고찰
일본문화학보
2019 .11
-
동남제도개척사 김옥균의 울릉도 목재 반출과 채무 상환을 둘러싼 조일 교섭
동북아역사논총
2021 .09
-
19세기 말~20세기 초 일본의 울릉도 · 독도 침탈과 한국인의 대응
영토해양연구
2015 .12
-
한국 고등학교 일본어학습자의 대일(對日) 인식
일본어문학
2023 .02
-
일본어학부 일본어웹프로그래밍 융합교과 운영을 통한 일본어전공 강화사례 연구
일어일문학
2017 .05
-
韓国人日本語学習者の接続辞「と」の使用実態 : 事実的用法を中心に
일본어학연구
2017 .09
-
관광일본어 온라인수업에서 카카오톡 톡게시판을 활용한 소통 사례 분석
일본연구
2021 .08
-
初対面の話題転換に関する考察 ―日本語母語話者と韓国人日本語学習者の比較を中心に―
일본문화학보
2021 .11
-
블렌디드 러닝의 학습자 니즈에 대한 일고찰 : 관광일본어 학습자의 설문지조사를 중심으로
일본연구
2019 .02
-
한국인 대학생의 일본어 학습 동기부여에 관한 연구 - 일본어 비전공자를 중심으로 -
일본문화학보
2024 .11
-
『日本語文學』의 硏究動向 分析硏究
일본어문학
2018 .01
-
1880∼1890년대 울릉도 물산을 둘러싼 분쟁과 조일 양국의 대응
사학연구
2022 .12
-
対日イメージと日本語学習動機づけ －韓国人日本語学習者及び日本関連専攻者の減少と関連して－
일어일문학연구
2018 .01
-
기초일본어 교재에서의 명사 어휘 분석 연구
일본문화학보
2019 .11
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
조선후기 한일 양국의 譯官記錄과 倭館
장순순
한일관계사연구
2018
.02
한국산악회의 1952년 「울릉도·독도 학술조사단 파견계획서」
이기석
영토해양연구
2017
.12
울릉도 도동현무암질암류의 화산작용과 암석성인
황상구
,
김재호
,
장윤득
암석학회지
2017
.12
전산유체역학 모델을 이용한 울릉도 지표 바람 특성에 대한 연구
문다솜
,
김재진
한국대기환경학회 학술대회논문집
2017
.11
울릉도 집중호우와 관련된 수치모의 연구 : 2016년 8월 29일 사례
정승필
,
인소라
,
김해민
외 3명
한국기상학회 학술대회 논문집
2017
.10
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-911-001374559