지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
There has been increasing studies on the different usage of ‘omou’ and ‘saeng gakhada’in recent years. Prior research did not include a theoretical concept of ‘omou’ and ‘saenggakhada’ and therefore was unable to provide a scientific explanation in the comparative analysis of these two words.
Drawing on the notion of hedge and politeness theory, this paper focuses on ‘omou’ and ‘saenggakhada’ used as assertives for politeness strategy.
Prior research has shown that ‘omou’and ‘saenggakhada’ co-occurs with a se ntence which has illocutionary force as assertives. However, applying the “weightiness (W) of a face-threatening act (FTAx)” from theory of politeness by Brown & Levinson (1978/1987) as a theoretical framework for the analysis,
this paper finds that ‘omou’ is used as hedge in a sentence which has illocut ionary force as assertives, regardless of the degree of distance (D) and extent of risk (R). In contrast, ‘saenggakhada’ is constrained when used as hedge in a sentence which has illocutionary force as assertives in following incidences : a) where risk (R) is high and distance (D) is far, b) where risk (R) is low and distance (D) is far in the value of relationship.
According to Itani (1996), “cultural aspects play an important role since the ‘appropriate’ amount of social hedging varies from culture to culture.” Using ‘omou’ and ‘saenggakhada’ as hedge supports this observation, and it can be witnessed in the context of both languages - Japanese and Korean.
Drawing on the notion of hedge and politeness theory, this paper focuses on ‘omou’ and ‘saenggakhada’ used as assertives for politeness strategy.
Prior research has shown that ‘omou’and ‘saenggakhada’ co-occurs with a se ntence which has illocutionary force as assertives. However, applying the “weightiness (W) of a face-threatening act (FTAx)” from theory of politeness by Brown & Levinson (1978/1987) as a theoretical framework for the analysis,
this paper finds that ‘omou’ is used as hedge in a sentence which has illocut ionary force as assertives, regardless of the degree of distance (D) and extent of risk (R). In contrast, ‘saenggakhada’ is constrained when used as hedge in a sentence which has illocutionary force as assertives in following incidences : a) where risk (R) is high and distance (D) is far, b) where risk (R) is low and distance (D) is far in the value of relationship.
According to Itani (1996), “cultural aspects play an important role since the ‘appropriate’ amount of social hedging varies from culture to culture.” Using ‘omou’ and ‘saenggakhada’ as hedge supports this observation, and it can be witnessed in the context of both languages - Japanese and Korean.
목차
1. はじめに
2. 先行?究
3. 理論的背景
4. 分析方法
5. 考察
6. おわりに
參考文獻
要旨
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
ポライトネスㆍストラテジーとしての「思う」と「생각하다」 : 指示型の発語内の力を持つ文において
일본문화학보
2015 .02
-
일본인 대학생 대화에 나타난 「思う」의 헷지용법 - 친소차과 성차에 주목하여 -
일어일문학연구
2019 .01
-
<と思う>が有する機能に関する小考 ー｢曖昧性｣と｢配慮性｣を中心にー
日本學硏究
2015 .01
-
‘같다’ 추측문의 남용과 글쓰기 교육
국어문학
2017 .07
-
한국어 공손성 연구의 쟁점 -선행연구 분석을 중심으로-
언어와 문화
2017 .01
-
判断表現「と思う」と「と見る」について -出現ジャンルにおける文法的特徴を中心に-
일어일문학연구
2021 .11
-
공손성 번역의 적절성에 관한 연구 : 문장종결형에 나타난 공손성을 중심으로
새한영어영문학
2015 .05
-
Teachers’ and Students’ Perception of Hedges in EFL Classroom
언어과학
2021 .01
-
한일 양국 젊은 층 대화에 나타난 헷지의 사용양상– 남자 대학생 대화를 중심으로 –
일본연구
2016 .01
-
Conceptualizing Politeness in Korean and English
현대영어영문학
2021 .11
-
Gender differences in politeness strategies in Korean conversation
용봉인문논총
2015 .01
-
공손성과 관련성 이론
국제언어문학
2017 .12
-
미국 대통령 선거 텔레비전 토론에 나타난 영어 공손전략 – 2016년 대통령선거를 중심으로
언어연구
2020 .01
-
일본인 여자대학생 대화에 나타난「思う」의 사용 양상 : 헷지용법을 중심으로
일본어학연구
2018 .12
-
A Comparative Study of Hedges between ES and KS in Two Fields of Study: English Education vs. Biology
영어학연구
2020 .01
-
Hong Kong EFL Learners' Politeness Strategy Use in Production and Perception of Requests and Refusals
영어평가
2021 .12
-
신문 텍스트에 나타난 한국어 헤지 표현의 사용 양상 연구
이중언어학
2018 .01
-
Is Politeness Instruction Being Neglected? Student Perceptions toward the Use of Politeness in the Language Classroom
언어과학연구
2019 .03
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-913-001546537