메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
신진숙 (경희대학교)
저널정보
동북아시아문화학회 동북아 문화연구 동북아 문화연구 제45집
발행연도
2015.12
수록면
21 - 42 (22page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
In this article I seek to develop the key pattern of East Sea Rim (ESR) mobility paradigm in the period between the late nineteenth century and the early twentieth century, which will also explain from when and how we have had the perceptions of ESR networks. Recently the issue of co-operations around ESR after the post-cold war has attracted the attention of many scholars. And yet the discourse of ESR is increasingly complicated and inconsistent in the fact that the sociocultural networks involving economic and political relations between Northeast Asia countries (such as Korea, Japan, China, and Russia) have been multi-layered. This means that it is significantly based on some cumulative mobilities constructed by international labour migrants, flows of goods, increase of traveling between countries, the development of internet and so forth. Needless to say, given that ESR mobility paradigm is relevant to the diverse mobilities of people, objects, images, information and products, we need to examine various matters with interdisciplinary perspectives, merging and comparing texts across languages, regions, cultures, and historical eras.
I show what have fostered mobilities and networks in ESR, analyzing the ‘travel essay’ written by the early modern Northeast Asian intellectuals, who are, especially, Min Yeong-hwan (1861–1905, a minister of the Korean Empire), Vladimir Klavdievich Arsenyev (1872-1930, a Russian geographer, researcher of the Far East), and Torii Ryuzo (1870-1953, a Japan anthropologist). Most spatial imaginations of ESR produced by them are associated with the binary and hierarchical dichotomy so-called the modern concept of ‘Western’ and ‘non-Western.’ However that is not all. From early modern times, interdependencies between them have already been emerging. That’s what I emphasize in this paper.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 근대적 시공간과 모빌리티
Ⅲ. 근대 초기 환동해 모빌리티 구조
Ⅳ. 결론
참고문헌
【논문초록】

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-910-002299509