메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
언어과학회 언어과학연구 언어과학연구 제25집
발행연도
2003.6
수록면
179 - 194 (16page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
English modal auxiliaries have been the subject of analyses from various perspectives. This paper attempts to verify some of the claims previously suggested in the literature regarding the semantics of the two modal auxiliaries, must and have-to. A discourse-pragmatic perspective has been adopted, and the verification is based on the real-life data, i.e., a television show transcript corpus. From the analyses most of the claims have been confirmed, despite the fact that one of the claims, i.e., the differential degree of agent - commitment, could not be validated for its idiosyncratic reasons. It has been shown that have-to and must signify necessity; that have-to and must may signify deonticity; that must signifies epistemicity, while have-to is less likely to do so; and that have-to prefers subject-animacy. In addition to verification of these claims, another notable observation is that these two modals are participating in the formation of discourse markers, though they are in their incipient stages, newly acquiring a discourse-pragmatic function of speaker-stance setting in the discourse, in the form of `I must say` and `I have to say`, with the former being less frequent. Another noteworthy observation is that there are instances, albeit m i d in number, where the two modals appeared without a subject, which is an intriguing phenomenon in a subject-oriented language. This seems to be attributable to the fact that these two modal verbs are participating in the formation of epenthetical forms marking the speaker`s epistemic stance. However, since the corpus utilized here has limitations in terms of its size and genre-specificity, these observations must await further research for validation.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-700-002556790