지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 대한외과학회 Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research Vol.90 No.4
- 발행연도
- 2016.4
- 수록면
- 194 - 200 (7page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to assess the breast-specific gamma imaging (BSGI) in Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) 4 lesions on mammography and/or ultrasound.
Methods: We performed a retrospective review of 162 patients who underwent BSGI in BI-RADS 4 lesions on mammography and/or ultrasound.
Results: Of the 162 breast lesions, 66 were malignant tumors and 96 were benign tumors. Sensitivity and specificity of BSGI were 90.9% and 78.1%, and positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 74.1% and 92.6%. The sensitivity or specificity of mammography and ultrasound were 74.2% and 56.3% and 87.9% and 19.8%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of BSGI for breast lesions ≤1 cm were 88.0% and 86.8%, while the values of beast lesions >1 cm were 92.7% and 61.5%. The sensitivity or specificity of BSGI and mammography for patients with dense breasts were 92.0% and 81.3% and 72.0% and 50.0%, respectively. 26 patients showed neither a nodule nor microcalcification on ultrasound, but showed suspicious calcification on mammography. The sensitivity and specificity of BSGI with microcalcification only lesion were 75.0% and 94.4%.
Conclusion: This study demonstrated that BSGI had shown high sensitivity and specificity, as well as positive and negative predictive values in BI-RADS 4 lesions on ultrasound and/or mammography. BSGI showed excellent results in dense breasts, in lesions that are less than 1 cm in size and lesions with suspicious microcalcification only.
Methods: We performed a retrospective review of 162 patients who underwent BSGI in BI-RADS 4 lesions on mammography and/or ultrasound.
Results: Of the 162 breast lesions, 66 were malignant tumors and 96 were benign tumors. Sensitivity and specificity of BSGI were 90.9% and 78.1%, and positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 74.1% and 92.6%. The sensitivity or specificity of mammography and ultrasound were 74.2% and 56.3% and 87.9% and 19.8%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of BSGI for breast lesions ≤1 cm were 88.0% and 86.8%, while the values of beast lesions >1 cm were 92.7% and 61.5%. The sensitivity or specificity of BSGI and mammography for patients with dense breasts were 92.0% and 81.3% and 72.0% and 50.0%, respectively. 26 patients showed neither a nodule nor microcalcification on ultrasound, but showed suspicious calcification on mammography. The sensitivity and specificity of BSGI with microcalcification only lesion were 75.0% and 94.4%.
Conclusion: This study demonstrated that BSGI had shown high sensitivity and specificity, as well as positive and negative predictive values in BI-RADS 4 lesions on ultrasound and/or mammography. BSGI showed excellent results in dense breasts, in lesions that are less than 1 cm in size and lesions with suspicious microcalcification only.
목차
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
참고문헌 (23)
참고문헌 신청
Kim KS, Kim Z, Shim EJ, Kim NH, Jung SY, Kim J, et al. The reality in the followup of breast cancer survivors: survey of Korean Breast Cancer Society. Ann Surg Treat Res 2015;88:133-9.
Kolb TM, Lichy J, Newhouse JH. Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations. Radiology 2002;225: 165-75.
Rosenberg RD, Hunt WC, Williamson MR, Gilliland FD, Wiest PW, Kelsey CA, et al. Effects of age, breast density, ethnicity, and estrogen replacement therapy on screening mammographic sensitivity and cancer stage at diagnosis: review of 183,134 screening mammograms in Albuquerque, New Mexico. Radiology 1998; 209:511-8.
Berg WA, Gutierrez L, NessAiver MS, Carter WB, Bhargavan M, Lewis RS, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer. Radiology 2004;233:830-49.
Berg WA, Blume JD, Cormack JB, Mendelson EB, Lehrer D, Bohm-Velez M, et al. Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer. JAMA 2008;299:2151-63.
Kolb TM, Lichy J, Newhouse JH. Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations. Radiology 2002;225: 165-75.
Rosenberg RD, Hunt WC, Williamson MR, Gilliland FD, Wiest PW, Kelsey CA, et al. Effects of age, breast density, ethnicity, and estrogen replacement therapy on screening mammographic sensitivity and cancer stage at diagnosis: review of 183,134 screening mammograms in Albuquerque, New Mexico. Radiology 1998; 209:511-8.
Berg WA, Gutierrez L, NessAiver MS, Carter WB, Bhargavan M, Lewis RS, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer. Radiology 2004;233:830-49.
Berg WA, Blume JD, Cormack JB, Mendelson EB, Lehrer D, Bohm-Velez M, et al. Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer. JAMA 2008;299:2151-63.
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Comparative Efficacy of Four Imaging Instruments for Breast Cancer Screening
Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP
2015 .01
-
Accuracy of Breast-Specific Gamma Imaging for Assessing Residual Tumor according to Molecular Subtypes in Breast Cancer Patients with Suspicious-Looking Calcification on Mammography after Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2021 .05
-
Detectability and Usefulness of Automated Whole Breast Ultrasound in Patients with Suspicious Microcalcifications on Mammography: Comparison with Handheld Breast Ultrasound
Journal of Breast Cancer
2016 .01
-
Efficacy of Mastocheck for Screening of Early Breast Cancer: Comparison with Screening Mammography
Journal of Breast Disease
2019 .01
-
Evaluation of the Relationship Between Family History of Breast Cancer and Risk Perception and Impacts on Repetition of Mammography
Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP
2016 .01
-
The Effectiveness of Breast Ultrasonography in Cancer Screening: A Comparison with Mammography
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2018 .11
-
Screening Ultrasound in Women with Negative Mammography: Outcome Analysis
Yonsei Medical Journal
2015 .01
-
Reliability of automated versus handheld breast ultrasound examinations of suspicious breast masses
ULTRASONOGRAPHY
2019 .01
-
Diagnostic value of Contrast-enhanced Spectral Mammography and Breast MR imaging in the evaluation of multifocality in Breast cancer patients
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2017 .11
-
Intraoperative Specimen Mammography for Margin Assessment in Breast-Conserving Surgery
Journal of Breast Cancer
2019 .01
-
치밀형 유방에서 Molecular Breast Imaging 검사의 유용성에 관한 고찰
핵의학기술
2016 .01
-
Screening Mammography CON
대한임상종양학회 학술대회지
2017 .02
-
The Predictive Value of Second-Look Ultrasound after Preoperative Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Journal of Breast Disease
2015 .12
-
Comparison of clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis in breast cancer patients with different Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System categories
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
2021 .09
-
Relationship Between Perceived Risk and Physician Recommendation and Repeat Mammography in the Female Population in Tehran, Iran
Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP
2016 .01
-
Comparison of Two Different Educational Methods for Teachers' Mammography Based on the Health Belief Model
Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP
2015 .01
-
초음파에서 고위험 병변과 DCIS
대한초음파의료영상학회 학술대회 초록집
2023 .05
-
유방암 검진 권고안 개정안
대한의사협회지
2015 .01
-
Mammography with a fully automated breast volumetric software as a novel method for estimating the preoperative breast volume prior to mastectomy
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
2021 .06
-
Stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy under lateral decubitus position
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
2015 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-514-002860564