지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper examines three film adaptations of Shakespeare’s Hamlet, and discusses the films as offering new understanding of adapted films as digital contents. Olivier’s Hamlet rearrange the scenes by abbreviating a considerable sum of lines and excluding some of the characters from the original. His approach to defining the reality of morally corrupted Denmark is the ethical one, completely ruling out political factors which can estimate the aspect of procrastination in Hamlet. In part Olivier’s choice to thus focus the film production is due to his insistence on the Oedipus Complex as a means to understanding Hamlet’s character and his relations with Ophelia, Gertrude, the ghost, and Claudius.
Branagh’s Hamlet gives the whole aspect of the play by using its full text. This enables the film not only to reveal the complexity of its major characters, but also to intensify its political meaning by including the Fortinbras subplot. And the film shows a strong tendency to make itself popular among the masses aiming at a box-office success. For example, it borrows various techniques from Hollywood movies, each popular genre of which focuses respectively on horror, eroticism and science fiction. These strategies and devices for boosting popularity invariably turn out to preserve or heighten the artistic values of the play.
Almereyda’s Hamlet is thrown into 21st century New York City, and is a filmmaker. His film adaptation of Hamlet is a unique combination of two approaches: commenting on both the play’s stage/screen existence and its place in the global culture of today, and discovering such aspects of the play that have not been shown, or at least highlighted, before. He chooses to acknowledge the achievments of his predecessors and refers not only to the iconography of Shakespeare on stage and screen bout to various other cultural influences. Also, he attempts to update the play for our times and take on an original and innovative interpretation. Moving the action of the film to New York 2000, he saturates the film with media and technology, thus creating alternative worlds that enable him to develop the plot on various levels of cinematic reality.
Branagh’s Hamlet gives the whole aspect of the play by using its full text. This enables the film not only to reveal the complexity of its major characters, but also to intensify its political meaning by including the Fortinbras subplot. And the film shows a strong tendency to make itself popular among the masses aiming at a box-office success. For example, it borrows various techniques from Hollywood movies, each popular genre of which focuses respectively on horror, eroticism and science fiction. These strategies and devices for boosting popularity invariably turn out to preserve or heighten the artistic values of the play.
Almereyda’s Hamlet is thrown into 21st century New York City, and is a filmmaker. His film adaptation of Hamlet is a unique combination of two approaches: commenting on both the play’s stage/screen existence and its place in the global culture of today, and discovering such aspects of the play that have not been shown, or at least highlighted, before. He chooses to acknowledge the achievments of his predecessors and refers not only to the iconography of Shakespeare on stage and screen bout to various other cultural influences. Also, he attempts to update the play for our times and take on an original and innovative interpretation. Moving the action of the film to New York 2000, he saturates the film with media and technology, thus creating alternative worlds that enable him to develop the plot on various levels of cinematic reality.
목차
I. 들어가며
III. 나오며
인용문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (27)
참고문헌 신청
Adelman, Janet. Suffocating Mother: Fantasies of Maternal Origin in Shakespeare’s Plays, Hamlet to The Tempest. London: Routledge, 1992. Print.
Almereyda, Michael. Hamlet 2000. Miramax Films, 2000.
Bradley, A. C.. Shakespearean Tragedy. London: Macmillan, 1904. Print.
Branagh, Kenneth. Hamlet by William Shakespeare: Screenplay, Introduction and Film Diary. London: Chatto & Windus, 1996. Print.
_____. Hamlet. Castlerock Entertainment, 1996.
Almereyda, Michael. Hamlet 2000. Miramax Films, 2000.
Bradley, A. C.. Shakespearean Tragedy. London: Macmillan, 1904. Print.
Branagh, Kenneth. Hamlet by William Shakespeare: Screenplay, Introduction and Film Diary. London: Chatto & Windus, 1996. Print.
_____. Hamlet. Castlerock Entertainment, 1996.
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
『햄릿』의 각색과 영화적 변용
국제언어문학
2017 .04
-
올리비에의 『햄릿』 해석과 각색
신영어영문학
2015 .11
-
앨머레이더의 <햄릿>에 나타난 미디어 테크놀로지
영어영문학
2015 .02
-
『햄릿』영화들과 정동
새한영어영문학
2016 .02
-
셰익스피어, 오늘을 이야기하다: 할리우드에서 부활한 『햄릿』
현대영어영문학
2018 .01
-
호두 껍데기, 자궁, 그리고 햄릿의 감옥?<햄릿>과 매큐언의 <호두 껍데기>
영어영문학21
2021 .12
-
셰익스피어의 『햄릿』과 테니슨의 『모드』의 비교연구: 생각의 문제
영어영문학
2016 .02
-
햄릿에서 셰익스피어의 관객 통제
고전 르네상스 영문학
2015 .01
-
햄릿과 그의 세계 : 하이데거의 『존재와 시간』을 통한 실존론적 존재론 고찰
Shakespeare Review
2015 .03
-
햄릿의 절대 주체로서의 “나”
영어영문학연구
2019 .01
-
색채의 상징성과 플롯 변형: <야연>(The Banquet)과 『햄릿』(Hamlet)의 비교분석
Shakespeare Review
2024 .06
-
A Synthesis of Lacanian Psychoanalysis and New Historicism in Explicating Hamlet’s Third Soliloquy
현대정신분석
2017 .08
-
양정웅과 스티븐 그린블랏: 애도극으로 『햄릿』 읽기
고전 르네상스 영문학
2016 .12
-
코울리지의 햄릿 이미지
Shakespeare Review
2015 .03
-
『햄릿』에서 죽음을 통한 오필리아의 역할
새한영어영문학
2022 .11
-
Hamlet and Turnus Compared: Their Views of Death
고전 르네상스 영문학
2017 .06
-
발터 벤야민, 칼 슈미트, 『햄릿』―‘주권’사상을 중심으로
현대영어영문학
2015 .01
-
Hamlet's (Un)manly Grief: the Cult of the Past in the Age of Theatrical Power
영미문화
2017 .01
-
합리적 개인주의 : 『줄리어스 시저』와 『햄릿』에 나타난 주체 형성하기
동서비교문학저널
2018 .09
-
국립극단 <햄릿>에 나타난 배우의 과제들 - 배우 이봉련을 중심으로
공연문화연구
2022 .02
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-800-002721949