메뉴 건너뛰기
Library Notice
Institutional Access
If you certify, you can access the articles for free.
Check out your institutions.
ex)Hankuk University, Nuri Motors
Log in Register Help KOR
Subject

Analyzing the Anti-multiculturalists' Construction of the 'Other' and the Allotropic Relationship between Multicultural and Anti-multicultural Discourses
Recommendations
Search
Questions

반다문화 담론의 타자 만들기를 통해 본 다문화-반다문화 담론의 협력적 경쟁관계

논문 기본 정보

Type
Academic journal
Author
Joo Won Yuk (경북대학교)
Journal
The Korean Sociological Association Korean Journal of Sociology Vol.50 No.4 KCI Excellent Accredited Journal
Published
2016.8
Pages
109 - 134 (26page)
DOI
10.21562/kjs.2016.08.50.4.109

Usage

cover
📌
Topic
📖
Background
🔬
Method
🏆
Result
Analyzing the Anti-multiculturalists' Construction of the 'Other' and the Allotropic Relationship between Multicultural and Anti-multicultural Discourses
Ask AI
Recommendations
Search
Questions

Abstract· Keywords

Report Errors
This paper examines the rise of anti-multicultural, anti-immigrant discourse and the ways in which it engages in the construction of migrants as the ‘Other’. In particular, it focuses on analyzing the gendered, classed, and racialized nature of this boundary-making practice. Since the mid-2000s, South Korea has been witnessing a proliferation of multicultural discourses and policy development. Whilst multicultural policies have largely been policies for the social inclusion of female marriage migrants and their ‘multicultural families’, multiculturalism indeed has emerged as a ‘discursive space’ within which migrant incorporation and racial/cultural diversity are discussed. In response to such policies, anti-multiculturalists who engage in anti-immigrant activism and strongly oppose the government’s multicultural policies have asserted their presence mainly via online forums. As the epithet ‘anti-multiculturalist’ was taken up by these people, it became synonymous with xenophobe or racist, although anti-multiculturalists themselves obdurately denied such associations. However, the seeming antagonism between anti-multiculturalists and multicultural discourse cannot be, in fact, explained as opposing views on racism; for example, as of racism of the former and anti-racism of the latter. Rather, the seemingly antagonistic relationship between multicultural and anti-multicultural discourses is best described as a not-so-much-inimical rivalry, in that they compete with each other, but also work together in drawing racialized boundaries between the self and the ‘Other’ while constructing the ‘Other’ in a gendered and classed way. In this sense, this paper argues that anti-multiculturalists play the role of keeping ‘too much’ or ‘bad’ diversity at bay while appropriating the logic of differentiation and hierarchization, embedded in the dominant multicultural discourse.

Contents

Ⅰ. 들어가며
Ⅱ. ‘담론의 장’으로서의 다문화주의
Ⅲ. 신자유주의와 반이주자 정서
Ⅳ. 민족과 문화 - 인종화된 경계들(racialised boundaries)
Ⅴ. 다문화-반다문화 담론의 젠더화된 구축
Ⅵ. 맺으며
참고문헌

References (0)

Add References

Recommendations

It is an article recommended by DBpia according to the article similarity. Check out the related articles!

Related Authors

Frequently Viewed Together

Recently viewed articles

Comments(0)

0

Write first comments.

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2017-331-001126133