지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Studies on the 1970s dealt with diverse topics, but shared the same perspective of emphasizing the oppressive nature of the “Yushin(유신)” system. This ironically sidelined the role played by the “Special Act concerning National Security”, which was the basis of the Yushin system’s existence itself. Studies of Labor history in the 1980s and ‘90s also concentrated on examining the abnormal nature of Korean Capitalism and the oppressive nature of the Yushin system, while studies of the 2000s concentrated upon examining the consciousness, culture and identity of the factory workers.
In this article, the labor policy of the 1970s is viewed as a policy formed in a climate which was witnessing the clashing of many different interests, as we can see from the nature of the so-called “Factory New Village(Saemaeul) movement,” which was one of the major pillars of the government’s labor policy at the time. It was a movement conceived, arranged and supported by the government, but was joined by many factions and individuals who had their own reasons and agendas. It is indeed a valid subject that could raise our understanding of their perspectives.
During the early half of the 1970s, the government and the Entrepreneur group modified its legal strategies behind their own labor control policies. But then, after 1976 the Korean labor market changed rapidly, due to industrialization and a booming economy. Because of these changes, the labor control strategy established in the early 1970s could not function anymore, and the government and the entrepreneur group tried to turn the tides with the “Factory New Village” movement. This movement, which began at the most lower ranks inside factories, generated an unexpected effect. As union activities were severely oppressed at the time, the workers used this Factory New Village movement to spread and inseminate ideas addressing their own problems. The experience of doing so nourished future labor movements, and as political and economic crises attacked Korea in 1979 and ‘80, a nationwide labor disputes and strikes exploded. The manner in which they broke out was quite different from the 1970s, but it should be noted that such disputes and strikes were using words and expressions perpetuated by their own opponents, which designed the ideology behind ruling in the 1970s. 1
In this article, the labor policy of the 1970s is viewed as a policy formed in a climate which was witnessing the clashing of many different interests, as we can see from the nature of the so-called “Factory New Village(Saemaeul) movement,” which was one of the major pillars of the government’s labor policy at the time. It was a movement conceived, arranged and supported by the government, but was joined by many factions and individuals who had their own reasons and agendas. It is indeed a valid subject that could raise our understanding of their perspectives.
During the early half of the 1970s, the government and the Entrepreneur group modified its legal strategies behind their own labor control policies. But then, after 1976 the Korean labor market changed rapidly, due to industrialization and a booming economy. Because of these changes, the labor control strategy established in the early 1970s could not function anymore, and the government and the entrepreneur group tried to turn the tides with the “Factory New Village” movement. This movement, which began at the most lower ranks inside factories, generated an unexpected effect. As union activities were severely oppressed at the time, the workers used this Factory New Village movement to spread and inseminate ideas addressing their own problems. The experience of doing so nourished future labor movements, and as political and economic crises attacked Korea in 1979 and ‘80, a nationwide labor disputes and strikes exploded. The manner in which they broke out was quite different from the 1970s, but it should be noted that such disputes and strikes were using words and expressions perpetuated by their own opponents, which designed the ideology behind ruling in the 1970s. 1
목차
머리말
1. ‘국가보위에 관한 특별조치법’과 노동통제 법령의 변화
2. 공장새마을운동의 전개와 중층적 효과의 발생
3. 노동통제전략의 위기와 노동운동의 고양
참고문헌
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
동일방직 사건과 1970년대 여성노동자, 그리고 지식
역사비평
2015 .08
-
4차 산업 혁명과 노동윤리
성경과 신학
2019 .01
-
이북명 소설에 나타난 노동 현실 연구 -사회적 상황과 노동 현실의 변화 과정을 중심으로
한국언어문학
2022 .07
-
Labor Movements in Neoliberal Korea: Organizing Precarious Workers and Inventing New Repertoires of Contention
Korea Journal
2021 .12
-
1960년 4월 혁명기 대구지역 노동운동 -제일모직노조와 대구시노동조합연맹의 활동을 중심으로-
대구사학
2017 .01
-
1950년대와 1960년대 전반기 노동운동의 좌절과 도전
역사비평
2016 .05
-
1979년, 그녀들의 선택 - YH노동조합 신민당사 농성
역사비평
2019 .08
-
중국의 경제성장 패러다임 전환과 노동정책의 변화
중국지식네트워크
2018 .01
-
American Factory에 나타난 신자유주의 다국적 기업이 초래하는 노동의 위기에 맞선 노동조합 설립 필요성에 관한 연구
현대영미드라마
2024 .08
-
1970년대 노동수기와 근로기준법
우리말글
2018 .06
-
1960-70년대 도시산업선교회의 ‘산업평화’ 수용과 국제적 관계 -인천기독교도시산업선교회를 중심으로-
한국민족운동사연구
2024 .09
-
한국 노동 다큐멘터리 영화의 역사적 기원 연구
민족문학사연구
2017 .01
-
1920년대 전반 군산지역의 노동운동 - ‘군산노동연맹회’와 항만하역 노동운동을 중심으로 -
역사교육
2020 .09
-
노동–자본의 뫼비우스 띠와 2010년대 후반 한국소설의 일·노동：향후 서사 속 노동의 문제설정 방식에 대한 단상을 겸하여
여성문학연구
2021 .01
-
1920년대 일본 노다와 조선 원산의 노동조합운동 비교 : 노동학교, 소비조합, 어용노조를 중심으로
역사연구
2023 .01
-
20세기 일본의 도시 이주와 대중식당업
해항도시문화교섭학
2022 .04
-
소유 없는 경쟁 - 북한 초기의 노동 개념과 이북명의 「노동일가」(1947)
한국문학과 예술
2023 .12
-
근대 노동 개념의 위계성 ― 서유견문에서 노동야학독본까지 ―
사림
2015 .01
-
기술의 역학과 여공의 정동 - 1930년대 공장소설을 중심으로
현대소설연구
2020 .03
-
반공이데올로기에 기반한 노동담론의 지형(1945~1950)
역사학보
2018 .06
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
1970-80년대 전북지역 여성노동자의 도시 경험과 근대 의식의 형성
이성호
지역사회연구
2009
.06
1960년대 후반 서울시 주택정책과 ‘중산층’문제 인식
김재원
한국사연구
2016
.12
누가 맞벌이화를 주도하는가? 맞벌이 이행에서 시기, 연령, 코호트 효과 분석
김수정
한국여성학
2015
.12
1960∼1970년대 주부 교양프로그램과 텔레비전의 젠더 정치 : 주부화, 탈주부화, 재가정화의 가족 이데올로기
백미숙
언론과 사회
2015
.11
동일방직 사건과 1970년대 여성노동자, 그리고 지식
홍석률
역사비평
2015
.08
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2017-911-002059379