메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
李康範 (中央大學校)
저널정보
중국어문학연구회 중국어문학논집 中國語文學論集 第101號
발행연도
2016.12
수록면
281 - 306 (26page)
DOI
10.25021/JCLL.2016.12.101.281

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
During the Qing dynasty, the status of historical scholarship was raised. Many scholars buried themselves in Textual Criticism(考證), and made many great achievements. Researches in Sima Qian’s ╵ Shiji(史記) were also very active. Liang Yusheng(梁玉繩)’s ╵ Shiji Kaozheng(史記考證) and Cui Shu(崔述)’s ╵ Kaoxinlu(考信錄) were their representatives. Liang thought that the text of Shiji was credible. He just tried to find historical evidences and correct the flaws in the process of transmitting the text. However, he was overly dedicated to finding historical evidences. As a result, he had attitude of doubt, and in many cases it was in vain. His evidential research about Baiyi Liezhuan(伯夷列傳) was an example of that attitude. Meanwhile, Cui maintained that some parts of Shiji was not credible, and denied the system of the Five Emperors in 「Wudi Benji(五帝本紀)」 entirely. But Cui was excessively obsessed by the sageness of Confucius(孔子). He defended Confucius by using a book he himself didn’t trust as an evidence of Confucius’s sageness. He was criticized for being irrational in defending the sage. That was his weak point.

목차

Ⅰ. 들어가는 말--乾·嘉史學의 지위 상승
Ⅱ. 梁玉繩考證의 득과 실
Ⅲ. 崔述의 著作원칙과 그 한계
Ⅳ. 梁·崔두 사람의 『史記』考證성과 비교
Ⅴ. 나오는 말
〈參考文獻〉
〈ABSTRACT〉

참고문헌 (25)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2017-820-002040172