지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper examines the situations and processes of the anti-Chinese riots from a local perspective in 1931, as well as changes in the Chinese community in response to the riots. The accident of anti-Chinese riots marked a chapter in the history of overseas Chinese in Korea and had a deep-reaching impact in their lives and economic situations. However, with the exception of Incheon, detailed studies on the riots by region have not been carried out yet.
Firstly, the anti-Chinese riots of Wonsan are examined in terms of local characteristics. Since the mid-1920s, Chinese merchants in Wonsan had been threatening grain merchants of Joseon by importing large quantities of millet from northern area of the state of Manju through Vladivostok, thus reducing freight time and costs and offering more attractive prices. Despite measures by grain merchants of Joseon to reject grains from Chinese merchants, the bulk of Manchurian millet imports were held by Chinese merchants until the late 1920s. In the late 1920s, the labor rights movement took hold in Wonsan, leading to frequent strikes among transport workers. The consignors responded to these strikes by employing Chinese laborers. Key examples of such strikes include the Wonsan laborers’ strike in June 1927 and the Wonsan general strike in January 1929.
The accident of 1931 riots broke out in Incheon on July 3rd. Meanwhile there were more damages of human lives in Wonsan where a riot had broken out since the evening of the 4th than in Incheon, and the overseas Chinese under the Wonsan Vice Consulate were exposed to the riots, with the exception of a few who managed to reach designated shelters. In the Wonsan Vice Consulate, the majority of victims chose to return to China instead of remaining in Joseon, making it difficult to track down their addresses. Thus, fewer victims ended up receiving the relief funds. This was also related to the capacities of the vice consulate.
Next, the study examines the changes to the status of overseas Chinese in Wonsan following the riots. The textile wholesale importers in the main stream of the Wonsan overseas Chinese society, were badly hit by the riots. Following the riots, 3 of the 4 major textile import wholesalers in Wonsan closed down, leaving just Detaiyuan(德泰源). Yongshunhao(永順號), a grain importer that grew rapidly in the mid-1920s, also had to close down. However, Tianhede (天和德), an exporter of Joseon sea cucumber and furs, remained in business even after the riots. This paper focuses on how Detaiyuan and Tianhede were able to continue its operations even after the riots. Although the Qing Concession in Wonsan was abolished after the annexation of Korea by Japan, the leases in perpetuity held by overseas Chinese in Wonsan were still protected. Detaiyuan held the largest land lease in China Town(支那町) in 1920, while Tianhede held the second largest land lease, with properties outside of China Town. In terms of business operations, both Detaiyuan and Tianhede showed outstanding performance. Although the riots did cause a contraction in their business activities, Detaiyuan and Tianhede were able to respond to changes in commercial networks based on existing land assets, maintaining their status within the overseas Chinese society.
Firstly, the anti-Chinese riots of Wonsan are examined in terms of local characteristics. Since the mid-1920s, Chinese merchants in Wonsan had been threatening grain merchants of Joseon by importing large quantities of millet from northern area of the state of Manju through Vladivostok, thus reducing freight time and costs and offering more attractive prices. Despite measures by grain merchants of Joseon to reject grains from Chinese merchants, the bulk of Manchurian millet imports were held by Chinese merchants until the late 1920s. In the late 1920s, the labor rights movement took hold in Wonsan, leading to frequent strikes among transport workers. The consignors responded to these strikes by employing Chinese laborers. Key examples of such strikes include the Wonsan laborers’ strike in June 1927 and the Wonsan general strike in January 1929.
The accident of 1931 riots broke out in Incheon on July 3rd. Meanwhile there were more damages of human lives in Wonsan where a riot had broken out since the evening of the 4th than in Incheon, and the overseas Chinese under the Wonsan Vice Consulate were exposed to the riots, with the exception of a few who managed to reach designated shelters. In the Wonsan Vice Consulate, the majority of victims chose to return to China instead of remaining in Joseon, making it difficult to track down their addresses. Thus, fewer victims ended up receiving the relief funds. This was also related to the capacities of the vice consulate.
Next, the study examines the changes to the status of overseas Chinese in Wonsan following the riots. The textile wholesale importers in the main stream of the Wonsan overseas Chinese society, were badly hit by the riots. Following the riots, 3 of the 4 major textile import wholesalers in Wonsan closed down, leaving just Detaiyuan(德泰源). Yongshunhao(永順號), a grain importer that grew rapidly in the mid-1920s, also had to close down. However, Tianhede (天和德), an exporter of Joseon sea cucumber and furs, remained in business even after the riots. This paper focuses on how Detaiyuan and Tianhede were able to continue its operations even after the riots. Although the Qing Concession in Wonsan was abolished after the annexation of Korea by Japan, the leases in perpetuity held by overseas Chinese in Wonsan were still protected. Detaiyuan held the largest land lease in China Town(支那町) in 1920, while Tianhede held the second largest land lease, with properties outside of China Town. In terms of business operations, both Detaiyuan and Tianhede showed outstanding performance. Although the riots did cause a contraction in their business activities, Detaiyuan and Tianhede were able to respond to changes in commercial networks based on existing land assets, maintaining their status within the overseas Chinese society.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 배화폭동과 원산화교
Ⅲ. 배화폭동 이후 원산화교의 변화와 그 대응
Ⅳ. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (42)
참고문헌 신청
[인터넷자원] - 駐朝鮮使館檔 / / 各口商務情形―各口商務情形(一) (馬廷亮)(02-35-056-01) / 臺灣中央硏究院近代史硏究所檔案館
[인터넷자원] - 駐朝鮮使館檔 / / 各華商會選擧及改組(03-47-045-01) / 臺灣中央硏究院近代史硏究所檔案館
[인터넷자원] - 駐朝鮮使館檔 / / 元山購買館地(03-47-075-01) / 臺灣中央硏究院近代史硏究所檔案館
[인터넷자원] - 駐朝鮮使館檔 / / 韓人仇華案(03-47-158-03) / 臺灣中央硏究院近代史硏究所檔案館
[인터넷자원] - 駐朝鮮使館檔 / / 商會改選董事職員(03-47-167-02) / 臺灣中央硏究院近代史硏究所檔案館
[인터넷자원] - 駐朝鮮使館檔 / / 各華商會選擧及改組(03-47-045-01) / 臺灣中央硏究院近代史硏究所檔案館
[인터넷자원] - 駐朝鮮使館檔 / / 元山購買館地(03-47-075-01) / 臺灣中央硏究院近代史硏究所檔案館
[인터넷자원] - 駐朝鮮使館檔 / / 韓人仇華案(03-47-158-03) / 臺灣中央硏究院近代史硏究所檔案館
[인터넷자원] - 駐朝鮮使館檔 / / 商會改選董事職員(03-47-167-02) / 臺灣中央硏究院近代史硏究所檔案館
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
중일전쟁(中日戰爭) 이전 시기(1912∼1936) 조선의 원산화교(元山華僑)
인문과학
2016 .01
-
일제시기 조선인 자본가층의 결집과 ‘지역번영’ 단체의 조직 : 1920년대 원산지역을 중심으로
한국사연구
2015 .12
-
1920~1930년대 초반 원산지역 조선인 자본가층의 지역정치 : 시영회와 시민협회의 선거 및 노동 개입을 중심으로
한국사연구
2016 .12
-
식민지 시기 조선 청진화교의 위상
동양학
2020 .01
-
영국 외교문서로 재구성한 1931년 만보산사건과 조선 반중폭동
동양사학연구
2021 .09
-
1931년 식민지 조선 반중국인 폭동의 학살 현장 검토
史叢(사총)
2019 .01
-
일제 식민지기 ‘원산노동병원’의 설립과 그 의의
의사학
2016 .12
-
21세기의 식량폭동과 신자유주의적 식량체제에 대한 정치적 도전
서양사연구
2015 .01
-
중일전쟁 시기 원산화교의 동향과 화교경제
史叢(사총)
2017 .01
-
원산총파업의 공간적 전개
한국독립운동사연구
2021 .02
-
식민지 조선의 반중국인 폭동과 도시 하층민
역사와 담론
2015 .01
-
식민지 조선 평양화교의 실태 ‒ 배화폭동 이전을 중심으로
동양학
2022 .04
-
개항장 도시의 스포츠 이벤트와 민족의 지리학 -일제시기 원산지역을 중심으로
탐라문화
2016 .02
-
1960년대 후반 한국군 시위 진압 교리의 특성 연구 —1969년 육군본부 발간 『야전교범 19-15 폭동진압』 분석을 중심으로
국학연구
2023 .03
-
1910~20년대 원산해수욕회사의 설립과 운영
역사교육
2024 .12
-
‘중화성’모색을 위한 시도들 : 서구권 및 동남아시아 지역 화교 화인 디아스포라 연구 경향 분석
중국근현대사연구
2017 .03
-
1920년대 중반 원산지역 아나키스트들의 공산주의 운동론 비판과 노선투쟁 : 원산청년동맹과 신간지회 결성 문제를 중심으로
한국사학보
2018 .08
-
북한의 피포위의식(Siege Mentality)과 역사적 단절－한국전쟁기 원산을 중심으로－
사이間SAI
2021 .11
-
재조선 화교 염상과 조선총독부의 외염 관리
중국근현대사연구
2018 .03
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2017-912-002301188