지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 한국미술연구소 미술사논단 美術史論壇 第45號
- 발행연도
- 2017.12
- 수록면
- 53 - 78 (26page)
- DOI
- 10.14380/AHF.2017.45.53
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Recent discovery of objects as enshrined relics concealed inside the wooden Amitabha triad of Wondangam hermitage at Haeinsa Temple provides important materials to estimate the manufacturing date of the triad. The purpose of this study is to estimate its date through a comprehensive examination of historical references and stylistic analysis.
A large-scale reconstruction of Haeinsa Temple was undertaken for three years from 1488 to 1490. Its related documents can specify major donors for the grand-scale Buddhist project, and this reconstruction was lavishly supported by the Joseon royal court.
Master Hakjo was in charge of the reconstruction project. The records that refer to his leading roles in the reconstruction of Wondangam in 1495 and the publication of Buddhist scriptures at the hermitage provide convincing evidence to succeed Buddhist projects of Haeinsa Temple led by Master Hakjo residing at Wondangam.
The wooden Amitabha triad of Wondangam is composed of Amitabha, Avalokitesvara, and Ksitigarbha. Amitabha buddha of the triad can be compared with the Buddha statues of the late 15th century such as Amitabha Buddha at Heukseoksa Temple(1458) and at Cheonjusa Temple(1482). What makes it interesting is that these statues might lead to similar characteristics with other Buddha statues manufactured in North Gyeongsang Province.
Kṣitigarbha statue of the triad is portrayed as a buddhist monk with shaven head, a typical iconographic feature of Kṣitigarbha during the first half of the Joseon period. The Avalokitesvara also shows similar features with Avalokitesvara statue of Gwaneumsa Temple(1502). Regarding its style, the Avalokitesvara of the triad might be able to confirm its date to the late 15th century.
Moreover, the objects discovered from the triad such as sarira, cylindrical huryeongtong (候鈴筒), and the others, were closely linked to those from the Vairocana Buddha at Haeinsa Temple of 1490. The practice of consecrating Buddha statues by storing these objects as contents seems to have developed into a specific regional type including Haeinsa Temple area. In so doing, an examination of textual records can make the commission of the Amitabha triad match with the reconstruction of Wondangam in 1495 led by Master Hakjo.
A large-scale reconstruction of Haeinsa Temple was undertaken for three years from 1488 to 1490. Its related documents can specify major donors for the grand-scale Buddhist project, and this reconstruction was lavishly supported by the Joseon royal court.
Master Hakjo was in charge of the reconstruction project. The records that refer to his leading roles in the reconstruction of Wondangam in 1495 and the publication of Buddhist scriptures at the hermitage provide convincing evidence to succeed Buddhist projects of Haeinsa Temple led by Master Hakjo residing at Wondangam.
The wooden Amitabha triad of Wondangam is composed of Amitabha, Avalokitesvara, and Ksitigarbha. Amitabha buddha of the triad can be compared with the Buddha statues of the late 15th century such as Amitabha Buddha at Heukseoksa Temple(1458) and at Cheonjusa Temple(1482). What makes it interesting is that these statues might lead to similar characteristics with other Buddha statues manufactured in North Gyeongsang Province.
Kṣitigarbha statue of the triad is portrayed as a buddhist monk with shaven head, a typical iconographic feature of Kṣitigarbha during the first half of the Joseon period. The Avalokitesvara also shows similar features with Avalokitesvara statue of Gwaneumsa Temple(1502). Regarding its style, the Avalokitesvara of the triad might be able to confirm its date to the late 15th century.
Moreover, the objects discovered from the triad such as sarira, cylindrical huryeongtong (候鈴筒), and the others, were closely linked to those from the Vairocana Buddha at Haeinsa Temple of 1490. The practice of consecrating Buddha statues by storing these objects as contents seems to have developed into a specific regional type including Haeinsa Temple area. In so doing, an examination of textual records can make the commission of the Amitabha triad match with the reconstruction of Wondangam in 1495 led by Master Hakjo.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 조선 전기 해인사 및 원당암 중창과 학조대사
Ⅲ. 목조아미타여래삼존상과 복장물
Ⅳ. 목조아미타삼존여래상의 제작시기와 왕실 후원
Ⅴ. 맺음말
참고문헌
ABSTRACT
참고문헌 (24)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
[Architecture over Time] 시간 위의 건축 12 : 합천 해인사 장경판전
매거진 키
2023 .12
-
조선 초기 해인사 목조비로자나불좌상 복장 후령통 연구
미술사학연구(구 고고미술)
2022 .12
-
<통도사 응진전 아미타여래삼존 벽화>연구
동악미술사학
2023 .06
-
寶林寺 철조비로자나불상의 後援과 制作工程 연구
동악미술사학
2022 .12
-
<경주 굴불사지 석조사면불상>의 조성 신앙 재검토
미술사학
2024 .08
-
일본 상대(上代) 아미타여래상(阿彌陀如來像)과 정토신앙(淨土信仰) -법륭사(法隆寺) 전래(傳來) 불상을 중심으로-
동양미술사학
2017 .02
-
<백률사 금동약사여래입상(栢栗寺 ⾦銅藥師如來⽴像)> 연구
미술사학
2024 .08
-
명조(明朝) 아미타불사십팔원(阿彌陀佛四十八願)과 서방극악세계(西方極樂世界) 도상(圖像)
동양미술사학
2017 .02
-
화엄사 목조비로자나삼신불좌상의 조성기 「施主秩」 분석
미술자료
2021 .12
-
조선 후기 울산 신흥사 석조아미타여래삼존좌상
미술사연구
2020 .06
-
신라하대 비로자나삼존불상의 양식특징과조성배경에 관한 고찰
불교미술사학
2018 .01
-
곡성 堂洞里寺址의 고려시대 석조여래좌상 고찰
불교미술사학
2015 .01
-
예천 용문사 <목각아미타여래설법상>의 佛敎信行 내용과 『周易』 卦象 표현
불교미술사학
2022 .10
-
강진 무위사 〈아미타여래삼존 벽화〉의 화승과 화풍 검토
미술사논단
2021 .06
-
개태사 석조여래삼존입상의 보수·복원 경위와 조성배경에 관한 검토
불교미술사학
2024 .03
-
전주 불정사의 1604년 목조아미타여래좌상과 복장유물
동악미술사학
2021 .12
-
완도 신흥사 목조약사여래좌상 중수 원문(1865년)의 분석과 양식 특징
동양미술사학
2024 .09
-
수원 봉녕사 석조삼존불상의 편년과 의의
동악미술사학
2015 .06
-
양산 통도사 <자장암 마애아미타여래삼존상> 硏究
불교미술사학
2022 .03
-
불상 도금법의 전통 계승과 근대적 변화
미술사연구
2019 .06
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0