지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2018.5
- 수록면
- 113 - 129 (17page)
- DOI
- 10.35227/HYLR.2018.05.29.2.113
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In terms of the international carriage of goods, the contracting parties often decide various international transport agreements in order to apply those rules to the transportations of land, inland waterway, sea or air. The international carriage of goods is largely conducted by more than two modes of transportations, but the unified agreements for this multimodal transportation have not yet been established. However, it is possible to arise some circumstances which may be applied by more than two transport agreements. For example, in case of transshipment which has a mix of various modes of transportation, it is uncertain of specifying a mode of transportation. Moreover, if there is a loss of or damage to the goods in the course of carriage; or if there is no explicit point of damage to the goods, it is so difficult to decide applicable agreements or the other rules governing these circumstances among contracting parties. In case of applying more than two agreements at the same time, conflicts of rules can occur. There might be a particular situation of non-applicability of any other transport agreements.
Meanwhile, when the dispute occurs between parties whose places of business are located in different countries, deciding forum is one of the fundamental issues. This is because according to the forum, the applicable rules not only can be varied, but also the issue of indirect applicability arises, if applicable laws are decided as some rules of transport agreements. Besides, interpretation of the applicable rules alters depending on the forum. Consequently, the issue of forum shopping which the dispute party chooses the forum to their own advantage occurs. Therefore, discussion on the applicable laws as well as conflicts of jurisdictions is necessary for resolving these circumstances.
One of the resolutions for it is the establishment of the unified transport agreement governing various modes of transportation. This would not be practicable as well as feasible in a complex reality with respect to the international trade, though. Therefore, it would be better to set specific terms of resolution for conflict of rules by contracting parties in advance. Forum shopping, paradoxically, would be a pioneer of the establishment of enhanced rules henceforth by means of comparing with different legal systems. The dispute parties should ultimately address the forum before taking legal actions so that they can choose the forum which produces the most beneficial results.
Meanwhile, when the dispute occurs between parties whose places of business are located in different countries, deciding forum is one of the fundamental issues. This is because according to the forum, the applicable rules not only can be varied, but also the issue of indirect applicability arises, if applicable laws are decided as some rules of transport agreements. Besides, interpretation of the applicable rules alters depending on the forum. Consequently, the issue of forum shopping which the dispute party chooses the forum to their own advantage occurs. Therefore, discussion on the applicable laws as well as conflicts of jurisdictions is necessary for resolving these circumstances.
One of the resolutions for it is the establishment of the unified transport agreement governing various modes of transportation. This would not be practicable as well as feasible in a complex reality with respect to the international trade, though. Therefore, it would be better to set specific terms of resolution for conflict of rules by contracting parties in advance. Forum shopping, paradoxically, would be a pioneer of the establishment of enhanced rules henceforth by means of comparing with different legal systems. The dispute parties should ultimately address the forum before taking legal actions so that they can choose the forum which produces the most beneficial results.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 관할권과 법정지 선택
Ⅲ. 준거법 결정문제
Ⅳ. 결론을 대신하여
【참고문헌】
【Abstract】
참고문헌 (33)
참고문헌 신청
[학술지(정기간행물)] - 송양호 / 2008 / 복합운송에 관한 입법논의와 외국입법의 검토 / 기업법연구 22 (3) : 53 ~ 88
[인터넷자원] - / / 한국무역협회 무역용어사전
[인터넷자원] - / / 관세청 관세용어사전
[단행본] - Jannet A. Pontier / 2005 / European conflict of laws. A complex history in a nutshell / Vossiuspers UvA
[단행본] - Joseph Fleuren / 2004 / Self-Executing Treaty Provisions / Boom Juridische uitgeversm
[인터넷자원] - / / 한국무역협회 무역용어사전
[인터넷자원] - / / 관세청 관세용어사전
[단행본] - Jannet A. Pontier / 2005 / European conflict of laws. A complex history in a nutshell / Vossiuspers UvA
[단행본] - Joseph Fleuren / 2004 / Self-Executing Treaty Provisions / Boom Juridische uitgeversm
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
운송협약규정의 충돌과 그 해결에관한 법적 고찰- 로테르담 규칙을 중심으로 -
법학논총
2018 .01
-
국제복합운송에서 로테르담규칙 적용에 따른 문제점에 관한연구
무역연구
2016 .01
-
해상운송계약에서 준거법의 결정
아주법학
2015 .01
-
로테르담 규칙의 운송서류 전자화에 대한 영향 평가
무역상무연구
2017 .08
-
Study on Drafting Appropriate Dispute Resolution Clause in International Contract
중재연구
2019 .01
-
복합운송에 적용되는 법의 결정을 위한 운송구간 구분에 관한 연구
한국해법학회지
2022 .04
-
한 · 중 · 러 · 북 국제복합운송에 대한 적용법률의 통일에 관한 탐색적 연구
법학연구
2018 .02
-
A Study on the Legal Concept of the Terms Covering at Least Two Different Modes of Transport
해사법연구
2015 .01
-
Direct Transport Rules in Regional Trade Agreements and Suggestions
무역연구
2017 .01
-
국제철도화물운송협정(SMGS)상 운송당사자의 의무 및 권리에 관한 연구
무역보험연구
2021 .12
-
일본의 의무적 공개매수제도
증권법연구
2017 .04
-
로테르담규칙과 중국해상법의 비교 연구
통상정보연구
2019 .03
-
서식의 충돌의 국제사법상 쟁점
국제사법연구
2017 .06
-
국제항공 여객 운송에서 지연손해와 배상책임
법조
2022 .10
-
국제항공여객운송계약의 준거법에 관한 연구 - 대법원 2014. 8. 28. 선고 2013다8410 판결을 계기로 -
국제사법연구
2022 .12
-
韩中货物多式联运法律体系中存在的问题及相关对策研究
동북아법연구
2021 .09
-
중국의 ‘일대일로’활용에 따른 한·중 복합운송 규정의 통일 필요성에 관한 연구 : 한국 상법 제816조와 중국 해상법 제102조·106조를 중심으로
법학연구
2016 .11
-
로테르담 규칙 제36조의 계약명세에 관한 연구
법학연구
2017 .02
-
해상운송인의 화물인도 지연 사례와 쟁점 연구 -유럽의 로테르담 규칙하에서
EU연구
2019 .01
-
로테르담규칙상 운송서류의 의의 및 주요 특징에 관한 연구
무역상무연구
2016 .02
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2018-360-002233383