지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Dr. Herman Bavinck, one of the three great reformed theologian together with A. Kuyper and B. B. Warfield in the 20th century, was orthodoxy Calvinist and exceptionally great scholar. The Science of Sacred Theology, Herman Bavinck’s inauguration speech to Kampen Theological University, introduced and translated for the first time into Korean by this writer, shows Bavinck’s clear reformed view of theology as Christian science. Theological students, being trained to serve God and His church, are at the outset need to be rightly guided to what theology is. Here is an excellent guide for theological training, Herman Bavinck!
The significance of the speech of Bavinck is largely two. Firstly, the speech is quite suitable to the inauguration to his professorship. For Bavinck deals with the essence of theology that he as a dogmatic professor will not only resolutely maintain but also together with the student he will teach pursuit. That is, Bavinck explains what theology is according to its unique character: the principle, the contents, and the purpose.
Secondly, Bavinck’s speech is a reformed response to ‘Zeitgeist’, namely, a political, theological direction in 19th century in the Netherlands. On the one hand, in the context of political environment, the Higher Education Law enacted in 1876 has Duplex ordo, dividing theology into two, naked religious studies of national universities run by government and the doctrines of faith of theological institutes according to the church tradition. Bavinck criticizes that theological education is not progressed, but rather regressed by that law. For the law, not understanding the unique principle, object, and the purpose of theology, divide theology into two following the prevailed rationalism at that time. On the other hand, in the inner circle of the church, one of the leading theological professors, like Rauwenhoff, insists that theology must be secularized. Bavinck, however, responds that secularization of theology means simply a death-sentence to theology, and asserts that the secularization reminds us the precious calling to preserve and maintain the holy and independent nature of theology.
The significance of the speech of Bavinck is largely two. Firstly, the speech is quite suitable to the inauguration to his professorship. For Bavinck deals with the essence of theology that he as a dogmatic professor will not only resolutely maintain but also together with the student he will teach pursuit. That is, Bavinck explains what theology is according to its unique character: the principle, the contents, and the purpose.
Secondly, Bavinck’s speech is a reformed response to ‘Zeitgeist’, namely, a political, theological direction in 19th century in the Netherlands. On the one hand, in the context of political environment, the Higher Education Law enacted in 1876 has Duplex ordo, dividing theology into two, naked religious studies of national universities run by government and the doctrines of faith of theological institutes according to the church tradition. Bavinck criticizes that theological education is not progressed, but rather regressed by that law. For the law, not understanding the unique principle, object, and the purpose of theology, divide theology into two following the prevailed rationalism at that time. On the other hand, in the inner circle of the church, one of the leading theological professors, like Rauwenhoff, insists that theology must be secularized. Bavinck, however, responds that secularization of theology means simply a death-sentence to theology, and asserts that the secularization reminds us the precious calling to preserve and maintain the holy and independent nature of theology.
목차
Ⅰ. 들어가는 글
Ⅱ. 펴는 글
Ⅲ. 거룩한 신학의 학문(de Wetenschap der Heilige Godgeleerdheid)
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
암스테르담 시절(1902-1921)의 헤르만 바빙크의 공적인 사역
신학지남
2015 .06
-
신학과 학문의 관계에 대한 개혁주의생명신학적 이해
생명과 말씀
2018 .01
-
총신에서의 헤르만 바빙크 수용과 연구사
신학지남
2021 .09
-
헤르만 바빙크의 『기독교와 교회의 보편성』
신학지남
2017 .03
-
한국학의 주제로서의 신학: 그 가능성과 전망
가톨릭신학
2015 .01
-
헤르만 바빙크의 『일반은총』(2)
신학지남
2016 .12
-
헤르만 바빙크의 『일반은총』(1)
신학지남
2016 .09
-
후기 북한 사회의 기독교 신학 구성에 대한 서설 : 후기 공산주의 사회들의 기독교 신학의 변화를 중심으로
신학연구
2016 .06
-
신학의 원초적 방법론으로서의 ‘철학적 신학’ : 신학과 인간학(즉, 철학)의 관계를 중심으로
인문학연구
2018 .06
-
The Commonalities and Divergences between Asian Theology and Latin American Theology: Focused on the Notion of Liberation
신학과 선교
2017 .05
-
헤르만 바빙크의 『개혁교의학』에 사용된 참고 문헌 분석
신학지남
2015 .03
-
「과학과 신학을 관련짓는 방식들」
Catholic Theology and Thought
2022 .12
-
자연의 신학과 자연의 과학
신학연구
2017 .12
-
신학의 원리(principia theologiae): 헤르만 바빙크와 아브라함 카이퍼의 계시 이해
개혁논총
2020 .01
-
Dialogue and Self-Confrontation: A Study of Ahn Byung-Mu’s Minjung Theology of Religions
Madang: Journal of Contextual Theology
2022 .12
-
헤르만 바빙크의 창조론
창조론오픈포럼
2021 .03
-
공공신학의 관점에서 본 존 칼빈의 신학
한국개혁신학
2021 .01
-
춘계 이종성의 통전적 신학에서 신학과 철학의 관계에 대한 연구
장신논단
2016 .03
-
기독교 자연신학의 가능성과 현실성 -칼빈의 자연이해를 중심으로-
조직신학연구
2019 .01
-
‘천주’(天主)와 ‘상제’(上帝) -다산 정약용에서의 천주교와 유교 그리고 정치적 사유-
원불교사상과종교문화
2022 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2018-231-002259745