지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 동양사학회 동양사학연구 東洋史學硏究 第143輯
- 발행연도
- 2018.6
- 수록면
- 141 - 175 (35page)
- DOI
- 10.17856/jahs.2018.06.143.141
이용수
이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)
- 이 논문의 후속연구가 궁금하신가요?
- 연관 학술논문 또는 학술발표를 통해 보다 발전된 연구결과를 확인하실 수 있습니다.
- 이 논문의 연구 히스토리 확인하기
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Tibet began to form modern nationalism since the late 19th century, and with the weakening of Qing Empire, the movement to establish a "Tibetan state" expanded. In particular, after the Republican Revolution of 1911, the Dalai Lama government of Tibet conducted national activities to complete an independent Buddhist state just like the Outer Mongolia. Mostly, the Republic of China and Tibet competed for the completion of "one China" and "one Tibet" respectively.
Overall, the center of Tibet in the first half of the 20th century remained largely in the hands of the British forces or buffer zones. In the meantime, Tibet was Insufficiently but partially transformed into a modern state, and in some periods, it had undergone major changes in the military and education sectors. In the first half of the 20th century, the Republic of China played an important role in the formation of national identity and formation of national consciousness in Tibet. The notion of region and ethnicity, both incompatible with each other, existed. Chinese nationalism grew in a confrontation with Japanese imperialism since the Manchuria Incident(1931), and in 1945 it finally reached the primary goal of the nationalism of the expulsion of foreign powers. The collapse of the Japanese empire once again raised the issue of the choice of Tibet to China or its own existence.
The Tibetan National History is proof of the existence of Tibetan nationalism, but in the first half of the 20th century, Tibet did not have a full-fledged modern historical narrative. It did not mean that Tibetan people did not have their own eyes of the Tibetan National History. Tibetan nationalism also had a historical example of its national heros and experiences, and emphasized some elements as needed. This paper focuses on the historical mural paintings of Norbulingka Palace which can be considered as the highlight of Tibetan historical mural paintings. It can be seen that the Tibetan people had formed a historical awareness of maintaining their own independent Buddhist civilized state. However, it can be said that the modern history narrative appeared relatively slowly.
Overall, the center of Tibet in the first half of the 20th century remained largely in the hands of the British forces or buffer zones. In the meantime, Tibet was Insufficiently but partially transformed into a modern state, and in some periods, it had undergone major changes in the military and education sectors. In the first half of the 20th century, the Republic of China played an important role in the formation of national identity and formation of national consciousness in Tibet. The notion of region and ethnicity, both incompatible with each other, existed. Chinese nationalism grew in a confrontation with Japanese imperialism since the Manchuria Incident(1931), and in 1945 it finally reached the primary goal of the nationalism of the expulsion of foreign powers. The collapse of the Japanese empire once again raised the issue of the choice of Tibet to China or its own existence.
The Tibetan National History is proof of the existence of Tibetan nationalism, but in the first half of the 20th century, Tibet did not have a full-fledged modern historical narrative. It did not mean that Tibetan people did not have their own eyes of the Tibetan National History. Tibetan nationalism also had a historical example of its national heros and experiences, and emphasized some elements as needed. This paper focuses on the historical mural paintings of Norbulingka Palace which can be considered as the highlight of Tibetan historical mural paintings. It can be seen that the Tibetan people had formed a historical awareness of maintaining their own independent Buddhist civilized state. However, it can be said that the modern history narrative appeared relatively slowly.
목차
Ⅰ. 문제제기 : 티베트 민족국가의 내셔널 히스토리의 형성과 발전
Ⅱ. ‘제국 사이의 티베트’의 민족국가 형성 과정
Ⅲ. 티베트 ‘민족국가의 역사’ 서술의 발전
Ⅳ. 맺음말
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (29)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
中华多民族谚语义类体系稳定性构建及其价值探讨
동아인문학
2018 .12
-
손진태의 <농가월령가(農家月令歌)> 번역과 그 성격
동방학
2019 .01
-
주체 사관에서 인민과 민족의 자리
역사비평
2022 .08
-
What It Means to Be a Tibetan in India? On Consequences of Creating the Unified Pan-Tibetan Identity
Localities
2016 .11
-
근대 한국종교에서의 ‘민족’(民族)과 ‘민중’(民衆) : Nation, Nation State, 그리고 Nationalism과 관련해서
원불교사상과종교문화
2017 .12
-
民國時期 傅斯年 史學의 興衰 : 과학주의와 민족주의의 연쇄
역사학보
2018 .12
-
1920년대 초 『동아일보』의 민간국제교류 기획과 그 의미
동방학지
2024 .06
-
한국 민족주의 연구의 쟁점과 과제
민족연구
2019 .01
-
민족/국민국가, 제국, 역사학 — 왕후이(汪暉)의 『아시아는 세계다』를 중심으로 —
중국근현대사연구
2023 .09
-
민족의 실체설에 대한 비판적 고찰
인문사회과학연구
2016 .01
-
What Kind of Nation-State Do They Want to Build: Chinese Intellectuals and Nationalism in Contemporary China
중국지식네트워크
2023 .05
-
실증사학의 ‘이념’ — 식민지 조선에 온 역사주의
인문논총
2019 .01
-
식민사관 비판론의 등장과 내재적 발전론의 형성
사학연구
2017 .03
-
유대민족과유대민족주의기원과관계탐색: 구약성서에 나타난 히브리어 고이(גּוֹי)를 중심으로
신학과 학문
2021 .08
-
제도로서의 역사학과 ‘민족서사’의 미래
역사학보
2015 .12
-
Two Memories, Two Historiographies
THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES
2019 .06
-
중국 탈서구중심주의 담론의 아포리아 : 20세기 국민국가와 중화민족 이데올로기의 이중성
중국근현대사연구
2015 .12
-
역사서술의 변천으로 본 中國의 티베트와 西藏－3종 『西藏通史』들의 출판을 중심으로－
史叢(사총)
2023 .05
-
헤겔의 민족적 국가 개념과 그 특성
사회와 철학
2024 .10
-
단동지역 조선족 언어사용실태 조사
중국조선어문
2017 .11
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2018-910-003143277