지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2018.11
- 수록면
- 259 - 284 (26page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper aims to analyze how intellectuals of the time reproduced the nature, objects and people of the changing space, how this reproduction differs from the existing writing, and the meaning of the changing space in the Southwest of China, with a focus on “Qianshu” (1690) of Tian wen (田雯, 1635-1703), the official and literary worker who worked in Guizhou in the early Qing empire. Until late Ming Dynasty, most of the records that reproduced the change of the southwest part including Guizhou emphasized the difference between the central plains (中原) and this place. And by recreating the person with the strange things and the surreal power of the changing area, although the area was politically part of China, it has also been regarded as a alien land(異域), both culturally and psychologically.
Indeed, the area was a semi-autonomous region that was virtually dominated by indigenous leaders until the early eighteenth century. However, since the establishment of Qing Empire, smaller changes to the changing region as well as changes to the perceptions of intellectual were starting to take place. The argument for cultural and ideological sinicization of the indigenous people through introducing civilization gains power. Tian wen’s “Qianshu”, unlike the previous record, emphasizes the wonders of Guizhou space, and reproduces the nature of the place like a Chinese landscape painting. Such a writing method serves to reduce Guizhou into a space of everyday life. Also, the poisonous herbs(毒草) of this place, which had previously been a source of fear for the Chinese officials, are subjected to the naturalistic narrative of the time, thereby eliminating the historical and social implications given to natural products here. All of these representations reflect the desire to construct Guizhou as part of the empire, not a place that is psychological distant. However, it does not differ from previous representation in terms of portrayal of people. The ethnographic description he used in this book is part of a shared knowledge system that can be found in other literature at the time, and he uses it without making any changes.
Therefore, he emphasizes that this space is not much different from areas in our daily lives but that people there are still barbarous and immoral, showing that this is a place where improvement is necessary and possible. In other words, “Qianshu” symbolizes Guizhou as a very suitable space to accommodate the civilization projects of the Qing Empire.
Indeed, the area was a semi-autonomous region that was virtually dominated by indigenous leaders until the early eighteenth century. However, since the establishment of Qing Empire, smaller changes to the changing region as well as changes to the perceptions of intellectual were starting to take place. The argument for cultural and ideological sinicization of the indigenous people through introducing civilization gains power. Tian wen’s “Qianshu”, unlike the previous record, emphasizes the wonders of Guizhou space, and reproduces the nature of the place like a Chinese landscape painting. Such a writing method serves to reduce Guizhou into a space of everyday life. Also, the poisonous herbs(毒草) of this place, which had previously been a source of fear for the Chinese officials, are subjected to the naturalistic narrative of the time, thereby eliminating the historical and social implications given to natural products here. All of these representations reflect the desire to construct Guizhou as part of the empire, not a place that is psychological distant. However, it does not differ from previous representation in terms of portrayal of people. The ethnographic description he used in this book is part of a shared knowledge system that can be found in other literature at the time, and he uses it without making any changes.
Therefore, he emphasizes that this space is not much different from areas in our daily lives but that people there are still barbarous and immoral, showing that this is a place where improvement is necessary and possible. In other words, “Qianshu” symbolizes Guizhou as a very suitable space to accommodate the civilization projects of the Qing Empire.
목차
1. Introduction
2. ‘Civilization project’ : Frontier policy change in the early Qing empire
3. A new method of constructing a Sinan frontier
4. Conclusion
【Bibliography】
【Abstract】
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
‘荒服’의 재해석 : 《黔書》와 淸 제국 邊境의 공간
중어중문학
2017 .03
-
宮?賢治の??四又の百合??の“百合”と“四”の探求
동양학
2021 .01
-
《苗蠻圖》와 18세기 청나라 정부의 문명화 프로젝트
중국학논총
2015 .01
-
從語義和語用層面談網絡諧音流行語 ― 以“耗子尾汁”、“藍瘦香菇”、“雨女無瓜”為例
중국어문학지
2021 .01
-
《花間集》 夢詞의 ‘꿈(夢)’에 대한 표현양상 연구
중국어문학지
2019 .01
-
民國時期 중국의 우생학 논쟁 : 유전과 환경의 논쟁을 중심으로
중국근현대사연구
2017 .03
-
영문 한국설화집에 나타난 ‘도깨비’의 양상과 성격 : 19세기말 20세기 중엽 출간본을 중심으로
한국학연구
2017 .12
-
출토 백자를 통해 본 조선시대 독산성의 변천 과정
백산학보
2021 .01
-
조선조 문천상의 충절에 대한 논의 연구
돈암어문학
2021 .06
-
시공간적 특징과 서사 전략 - 다와다 요코(多和田葉子)의 ‘미래 소설’을 중심으로 -
일본문화학보
2024 .11
-
继承与转变，多样性与可能性 : 关于最近中国的戏剧表演及表演环境的试探
한국중국어교육학회 학술대회
2017 .06
-
針對交際意圖的認知語境硏究
중국어문학
2019 .01
-
「昌寧拓境碑」의 ‘四方軍主’와 新羅의 天下觀
한국고대사연구
2021 .06
-
現代漢語新興程度副詞“爆”的認知語義演化機制分析
중국어교육과연구
2020 .12
-
現代漢語新興程度副詞“超”的認知語義演化機制分析
중국어문학논집
2021 .02
-
현대중국어 어체사(語體詞)의 교차사용과 수사(修辭)원칙
수사학
2015 .09
-
淸末 淸朝의 鴨綠江·豆滿江 邊境行政과 韓人 管理 - 安東과 北間島 지역의 비교를 중심으로 -
동국사학
2018 .01
-
1995~2015년 명청사 연구 성과와 새로운 전망
동양사학연구
2015 .12
-
《七劍十三俠》的板本與幻想英雄敍事
한국중어중문학 우수논문집
2018 .11
-
修辭의 定義 및 『論語』에 있어서 修辭의 空間 考察
한국수사학회 학술대회
2016 .11
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2019-820-000121549