지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 중국어문학연구회 중국어문학논집 中國語文學論集 第113號
- 발행연도
- 2018.12
- 수록면
- 223 - 247 (25page)
- DOI
- 10.25021/JCLL.2018.12.113.223
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper takes note of the phenomenon, in which concepts such as “neo-mythologism” or “mythologism” are catching on in recent Chinese mythological field. It could be understood that for about a decade since 2004, the concept neo-mythologism presented by mythologists Ye Shuxian and others was a trend, which has then made way for that of mythologism proposed by Yang Lihui since 2014. These two concepts appeared in existing literary criticisms, but the former was used to indicate the signs of the revival of mythology that was noticeable in fantasy fictions, movies, or electronic games, which were immensely popular from the late twentieth century through early twenty-first century, whereas the latter referred to the use and reconstruction of myths in contemporary societies.
This paper was motivated by the need and desire to understand the trend of present-oriented mythology appearing in recent Chinese mythological world, through which to explore the nowness of mythology. For this purpose, the formation of Ye Shuxian’s discourse of neo-mythologism, as well as its development and primary arguments were first examined. His discourse of neo-mythologism has markedly positive aspects in that it expanded the horizon of mythological studies which moved beyond the academic rigorism, pursued its contemporary significance, and further developed the paths of dynamic criticism and creation by underscoring the role of mythology in literary criticism. However, it must be treated with caution in that the concept of “myth” can appear somewhat confusing, as he has broadened the subjects covered by mythology to excess. Hence, in discussing the nowness of mythology, one needs to distinguish between the mythicalness and the appropriation of myths. Another cautionary note is that in emphasizing the so-called “Eastern values” or “feminine values” through his neo-mythologism, he has allowed the possibility of yet another self-orientalism to be produced. On the other hand, the discourse of mythologism proposed by Yang Lihui deals with the appropriation of myths or the use and reconstruction of myths in contemporary societies in a more strict sense, which requires continued attention, as it is currently a topic that is actively brought up and discussed within Chinese mythological world.
This paper was motivated by the need and desire to understand the trend of present-oriented mythology appearing in recent Chinese mythological world, through which to explore the nowness of mythology. For this purpose, the formation of Ye Shuxian’s discourse of neo-mythologism, as well as its development and primary arguments were first examined. His discourse of neo-mythologism has markedly positive aspects in that it expanded the horizon of mythological studies which moved beyond the academic rigorism, pursued its contemporary significance, and further developed the paths of dynamic criticism and creation by underscoring the role of mythology in literary criticism. However, it must be treated with caution in that the concept of “myth” can appear somewhat confusing, as he has broadened the subjects covered by mythology to excess. Hence, in discussing the nowness of mythology, one needs to distinguish between the mythicalness and the appropriation of myths. Another cautionary note is that in emphasizing the so-called “Eastern values” or “feminine values” through his neo-mythologism, he has allowed the possibility of yet another self-orientalism to be produced. On the other hand, the discourse of mythologism proposed by Yang Lihui deals with the appropriation of myths or the use and reconstruction of myths in contemporary societies in a more strict sense, which requires continued attention, as it is currently a topic that is actively brought up and discussed within Chinese mythological world.
목차
1. 현재지향의 신화학: 신(新)신화주의와 신화주의
2. 신신화주의의 출현과 인류학 상상
3. 신신화주의의 영역 : 신화적인 것과 신화의 활용 사이
4. 신신화주의에서 신화주의로
5. 맺음말
參考文獻
ABSTRACT
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
중국식 신화주의 담론 출현의 동인으로서 포크로리즘과 신화주의의 딜레마
중국소설논총
2020 .01
-
Return of Myth, Myth Resources, and the Contemporaneity of Mythology in Korea and China Today
International Journal of Korean History
2022 .02
-
21세기 중국 신화의 현재성 담론에서 ‘神話資源’ 토론의 발단
중국어문학논집
2021 .06
-
葉舒憲의 儒家神話論에 대한 비판적 고찰
중국어문학논집
2016 .02
-
중국신화학에서 유가의 위상과 전용(轉用)
중국어문학논집
2017 .02
-
중국신화를 둘러싼 한중 갈등 양상과 그 원인
중국소설논총
2023 .04
-
한국신화의 문학교육 내용 구성의 한 방향- 웹툰 「신과 함께」를 활용하여
우리말교육현장연구
2018 .01
-
매체성을 통해 보는 중국 신화의 현재성 - 禹治水신화의 전승 변주와 활용
중국어문학논집
2024 .06
-
The Possibility of Archetypal Cogitation and Succession Education in East-West Mythological Texts
동서비교문학저널
2022 .12
-
중국 소수민족 신화와 생태, 그리고 ‘공유(commons)’ - 담론의 전쟁에서 공유의 담론으로
중국어문학논집
2021 .08
-
장소화의 양상과 의미 탐구 - 신화 공간을 중심으로
로컬리티 인문학
2019 .10
-
구비신화의 상황중심적 커뮤니케이션 특성과 교감적 메시지로서의 기능
한국언어문학
2015 .01
-
동·서양 일월 신화에 나타나는 성차 담론의 반복과 차이 - 원형론·구조론·위상론과 전복적 여성성 -
인문과학연구
2022 .07
-
예수셴의 ‘신화역사’와 ‘옥’ 담론에 대한 비판적 검토 : 『중화문명 탐원의 신화학 연구』에 나타난 견해를 중심으로
중국어문학논집
2018 .04
-
아버지의 이름 고찰 -단군신화와 주몽신화를 중심으로-
문학치료연구
2021 .01
-
〈중화문명탐원의 신화학 연구〉에 대한 비판적 검토 : ‘도상’을 중심으로
중국어문학논집
2018 .08
-
2015 개정 중학교 국어 교과서에 나타난 신화교육의 문제점과 개선 방안
한국언어문학
2018 .01
-
中?始祖神??比?究
철학∙사상∙문화
2021 .01
-
재일문학 속 재일한국인 표상 연구 -원수일의 『이카이노이야기(猪飼野物語)』를 중심으로-
일본문화학보
2022 .08
-
최남선(崔南善) 「불함문화론(不咸文化論)」과 중국 사상 -중국 신화와 철학의 사유를 중심으로-
도교문화연구
2020 .05
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
〈중화문명탐원의 신화학 연구〉에 대한 비판적 검토 : ‘도상’을 중심으로
金善子
중국어문학논집
2018
.08
예수셴의 ‘신화역사’와 ‘옥’ 담론에 대한 비판적 검토 : 『중화문명 탐원의 신화학 연구』에 나타난 견해를 중심으로
李有鎭
중국어문학논집
2018
.04
葉舒憲의 儒家神話論에 대한 비판적 고찰
宋東盈
중국어문학논집
2016
.02
｢莊子序｣ 眞僞 問題와 郭象의 『莊子』 編輯에 관한 고찰
오일훈
도교문화연구
2018
.11
조선 시대의 『산해경(山海經)』 수용 약론(略論) : 문헌자료를 중심으로
정재서
도교문화연구
2017
.11
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2019-820-000299055