지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2018.12
- 수록면
- 145 - 181 (37page)
- DOI
- 10.46834/jkmcah.2018.12.36.145
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The 1980s in Korea has been defined as the era of democratization movement. However, the 1980s was also over-determined by the Seoul Olympic Games. This paper attempted to restore the ‘multi-layered structure’ of art in the 1980s in the context of the tension between democratization and the Olympics. The art movement in the 1980s, including ‘Reality and Remarks’, raised a question about such definitive power from the viewpoint of institutional criticism and activated critical discourses surrounding ‘democratization of art.’ On the other hand, the military dictatorship government structured cultural policies under the name of “Cultural Olympics” in the preparation process of the Seoul Olympics, and made an efforts to suppress and exclude the art movements’ institutional criticism and their practices. Therefore, this paper examined the institutional criticism of the 1980s art movement and the cultural policy that used “Cultural Olympics” as a just and a way, and critically analyzed the relationship between the cultural policy and the art movement of this Olympic era. By doing so, I intended to question the paradoxical situation in which democratization “supports the victory of the old thing” in the era after democratization was the legacy of the Seoul Olympics, which the dictatorship government had put its all-out efforts throughout the 1980s.
The Olympic cultural policy system, which was operated as an emergency system for the success of the Seoul Olympics, was implemented as a permanent cultural policy system in the era of democratization. And the violent oppression and exclusion of the ‘rebelliousness’ inherent in the emergency system of the 1980s was also inextricably permanent, and the ‘fiction of art democracy’, which, Sung Wan-kyung said, separated art from politics and bound it to the myth of modern art, was further strengthened. This is because the process of preparing and hosting the Olympics required to approve and mobilize state-led cultural policies, and in such process the definitive power about art, art movement, and art system has been transferred to the framework of national cultural policy. The process of transfer revealed the violence of the definitive power of the state, which distinguished between ‘pure’ art and ‘rebellious’ art, between art and non-art. Therefore, this violent and regulatory power of the state in the 1980s was not separate from the “Cultural Olympics” created by the government and the Olympic cultural policy system, which was a support for it, but an important part.
The Olympic cultural policy system, which was operated as an emergency system for the success of the Seoul Olympics, was implemented as a permanent cultural policy system in the era of democratization. And the violent oppression and exclusion of the ‘rebelliousness’ inherent in the emergency system of the 1980s was also inextricably permanent, and the ‘fiction of art democracy’, which, Sung Wan-kyung said, separated art from politics and bound it to the myth of modern art, was further strengthened. This is because the process of preparing and hosting the Olympics required to approve and mobilize state-led cultural policies, and in such process the definitive power about art, art movement, and art system has been transferred to the framework of national cultural policy. The process of transfer revealed the violence of the definitive power of the state, which distinguished between ‘pure’ art and ‘rebellious’ art, between art and non-art. Therefore, this violent and regulatory power of the state in the 1980s was not separate from the “Cultural Olympics” created by the government and the Olympic cultural policy system, which was a support for it, but an important part.
목차
Ⅰ. 들어가며 : ‘다층적 구조’의 미술사와 서울올림픽
Ⅱ. ‘미술의 민주화’=‘미술 민주주의의 허구’ 비판 : 제도비판의 공론장으로서의 그룹운동
Ⅲ. ‘문화올림픽’의 탄생 : 올림픽문화정책체제의 확립과 문화공보부의 문화정책 총력전
Ⅳ. 올림픽반대운동과 ‘민주화’의 제도적 전용 : ‘불온함’의 배제와 낡은 신화의 승인
Ⅴ. 맺으며 : 올림픽 시대의 장기지속 또는 경로의존성?
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
일본사회와 도쿄올림픽 정책 : 3회의 하계올림픽을 중심으로
한국체육과학회지
2017 .10
-
Art is everywhere
한국기초조형학회 작품집
2024 .08
-
Art can do it!
한국기초조형학회 작품집
2024 .08
-
become art
한국기초조형학회 작품집
2018 .11
-
서울올림픽 개최 반대여론에 대한 사회문화적 고찰
한국체육사학회지
2016 .01
-
2012년 런던올림픽과 문화정체성
한국체육사학회지
2020 .01
-
Cultural Arts의 미국 도시별 용법
한국무용교육학회지
2017 .01
-
Reconstructing Art Criticism in Korea : A Proposal for Selecting Agenda for Art Criticism in Korea
한국예술연구
2018 .02
-
올림픽 신규 종목 도입이 올림픽의 이미지, 태도, 시청 의도에 미치는 영향 : 밀레니얼 세대를 중심으로
한국사회체육학회지
2022 .04
-
2012년 런던올림픽 대회와 2016년 리우올림픽 대회 평행봉 경기 연기내용 비교분석
체육과학연구
2017 .01
-
빅데이터분석을 활용한 도쿄올림픽의 인식
한국체육과학회지
2020 .02
-
88서울올림픽에서 조영제의 역할과 영향
기초조형학연구
2018 .12
-
Sport Policy Development in China: Legacies of Beijing’s 2008 Summer Olympic Games and 2022 Winter Olympic Games
Journal of Global Sport Management
2021 .09
-
예비 문화예술교육사 현장 실습에 관한 현황 조사
음악교육공학
2020 .01
-
동계올림픽 개회식 스토리텔링의 방향성 : 2014 소치동계올림픽, 2018 평창동계올림픽 비교 연구
한국사회체육학회지
2018 .11
-
변화하는 올림픽, 패러다임의 전환 : 올림픽과 양성평등
한국여성체육학회지
2015 .09
-
a focus on art
한국기초조형학회 작품집
2024 .08
-
중화민국 전기 미술정책과 미술학교의 대응 발전 (1912~1928)
미술사논단
2016 .06
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
봉준호 감독 영화에 나타난 블랙코미디 요소와 창의성 연구 - 영화〈기생충〉을 중심으로 -
김성훈
한국콘텐츠학회논문지
2021
.11
한・일 영화텍스트에 나타난 사회문제 -『기생충』과 『어느 가족』을 중심으로 -
김화영
,
오현진
일어일문학
2021
.08
계승되지 못한 올림픽 "장외금메달" : 서울올림픽 전산시스템 개발사
신향숙
과학기술학연구
2019
.07
케니 샤프의 미술 : 디스토피아와 유토피아
조은영
현대미술사연구
2018
.12
페미니즘 운동과 미디어 윤리 : #미투 운동 사례를 중심으로
이희은
언론정보연구
2018
.08
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2019-605-000326896