메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
Ji Hyun Kim (Keimyung University)
저널정보
한국응용언어학회 응용언어학 응용언어학 제35권 제2호
발행연도
2019.6
수록면
53 - 81 (29page)
DOI
10.17154/kjal.2019.6.35.2.53

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The study extends current research into written corrective feedback (WCF) in two ways. First, it compared the effect of three different types of explicit WCF (i.e., direct correction, metalinguistic explanations, and direct correction + metalinguistic explanations) on the accuracy development of a syntactic feature (the hypothetical conditional) and a grammatical morpheme (the indefinite English article). Second, the study explored whether or not learners’ language analytic ability (LAA) facilitated the extent to which WCF benefited their accuracy gains. The study followed a pretest-posttest-delayed posttest design, and the data were collected from four intact classrooms at a university. It was found that all types of WCF contributed to the accuracy gains in both forms. However, the degree and the length of effectiveness was subject to the type of feedback and the target forms. The study’s findings as regards LAA show that for the hypothetical conditional, learners with strong LAA improved accuracy more than learners with weak LAA via the direct correction and the metalinguistic explanations. But in the direct correction + metalinguistic explanation conditions, LAA was unrelated to the degree of gains. For the indefinite article, no relationship was found between learners’ LAA and their accuracy gains.

목차

Ⅰ. INTRODUCTION
Ⅱ. LITERATURE REVIEW
Ⅲ. METHODOLOGY
Ⅳ. RESULTS
Ⅴ. DISCUSSION
Ⅵ. CONCLUSION
REFERENCES

참고문헌 (42)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2019-701-000755478