메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국해법학회 한국해법학회지 한국해법학회지 제25권 제1호
발행연도
2003.1
수록면
233 - 264 (32page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This paper focuses on the issues of financial responsibility of the Oil Pollution Act(OPA 1990) of 1990 because they have not been clearly solved even though it has passed more than 10 years since it was enacted. They are as follows:first, the possibility of unlimited horizontal liability., second, the possibility of unlimited direct action and last, the issue of P & I Clubs acting as guarantors. The first issue is presented since it is possible that individual State statutes in the US could repeatedly make a P & I Club expose to liability for the same accident, i.e. that the P & I limit will be construed as a separate limit by each individual State. But it can be solved by 33 CFR§138.80(d)(2) which provides that 'in the event of any finding that liability of guarantor exceeds the amount of guaranty ... that guaranty is considered null and void with respect to that excess.' An opinion was presented that the second issue could be solved by narrowly restricting the direct claim actions both procedurally and substantively, that is, only after certain conditions are met, and only in one forum. The third issue was solved by the participation of alternative commercial insurance companies acting as guarantors. However, OPA 1990 and the financial responsibility issues are still heavily criticized not only by P & I Clubs but by the shipping and oil industry in that their legal and economic implications have not been solved clearly until now. So. the core rules of OPA 1990 should be stipulated more clearly.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0