메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국경영법률학회 경영법률 경영법률 제18권 제2호
발행연도
2008.1
수록면
389 - 413 (25page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
In 2004, Korea deposited its instrument of accession to the United Nation Convention on the International Sales of Goods(CISG) with the Secretary-General of the United Nations. Following this development, the CISG entered into force, insofar as Korea was concerned, in March 2005. Therefore, the similarities and differences between the CISG and Korean Laws need to be examined. This study compares CISG with Korean Corporate and Civil Law about 'offer and acceptance of Contact'. There are eight major difference about these CISG and Korean Laws. First, CISG applies on 'place of business' but Korean Corporate law applies on 'merchant'. Second, CISG defines about 'Offer' and 'Acceptance'. But there is no definition in Korean Corporate and Civil Law. Third is deal with a lack of contract's main contents. Forth, CISG and Korean Civil Law differently regulate about offer's withdrawal. Fifth, in CISG, silence or inactivity doesn't admit in itself to acceptance. But Korean Corporate and Civil Law don't define. Sixth, Battle of Form doesn't define CISG and Korean Corporate and Civil Law. Seventh, there are some difference of view point between CISG and Koresn Civil Law on late acceptance. Final, Korean Corporate Law regulates obligation of notice. These differences are partly derived from both the reasonable character of the CISG and the defects in Korean Corporate and Civil Law. Thus, this study undergoes the imperative need to amend Korean Corporate and Civil Law in conformity with its obligations under the CISG.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (25)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0