메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국현대영미시학회 현대영미시연구 현대영미시연구 제16권 제1호
발행연도
2010.1
수록면
1 - 28 (28page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This paper aims to look for a possibility of contradictory combination of region-centered bioregionalism and cosmopolitanism in Gary Snyder’s ecology through Immanuel Kant and Jacques Derrida. Snyder’s worries about regionalism implicit in bioregionalism urge him to introduce cosmopolitanism. Snyder proposes to keep a balance between cosmopolitanism and bioregionalism. In his essay on cosmopolitanism, Kant presents the idea of ‘a common right to the surface of the earth.’ The earth is a common land to all. All are ‘natives’ to the earth. According to Jacques Derrida’s interpretation of Kantian cosmo- politanism, Kant acknowledges the common right to the surface of the earth but Kant would like to reserve an exclusive right for what is ‘erected’ or ‘constructed’ on the surface of the earth. But Derrida says that when an exclusive right is secured, an ‘initial violence’ is done to the common right to the surface of the earth. Derrida argues that any ‘habitat’ is just an ‘illegally’ and ‘violently’ ‘constructed’ one that interferes with ‘the common right to the surface of the earth.’ All ‘habitats’ are ‘illegals.’ Any regionalism or even bioregionalism is one of ‘illegals’ in the light of the cosmopolitan right to the surface of the earth. With Kantian idea of cosmopolitanism and Derrida’s interpretation of Kantian cosmopolitanism, this paper shows that Snyder’s bioregionalism can be acceptable only if it is based on cosmopolitanism since even bioregions can be thought to be ‘constructed’ or ‘erected’ on ‘the surface of the earth’ that ‘originally’ belongs to all on the earth without any discrimination, animals, humans, plants, mountains, predators, enemies, etc. Any ‘re-inhabitation’ in land and ‘becoming natives’ to land which Snyder suggests in his ecological projects should begin with the idea of ‘pure land’ on which nothing has been ‘constructed,’ like ‘the surface of the earth.’ The common right to the surface of the earth should be given priority to. After this right is guaranteed, an ecological community can be ‘constructed’ or ‘erected’ on the surface of the earth regionally and temporarily, and only then, cosmopolitan bioregionalism can be put into practice.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (20)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0