메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국현대영미시학회 현대영미시연구 현대영미시연구 제11권 제1호
발행연도
2005.1
수록면
137 - 164 (28page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
In studying the literary relationship between Langston Hughes and Walt Whitman, Julia Kristeva's concept of intertextuality provides us with a new way to appreciate Hughes's creative originality. Without resorting to Harold Bloom's influence theory and depreciating Hughes's poetic originality, it allows us to analyze how he succeeds to Whitman actively reading his democratic vision of America and at the same time creating a new signifying process in which black people can recognize themselves as subjects. Mostly, Hughes's dialogical relationship with Whitman is materialized in justifying and supplementing Whitman's poetic vision of American Self and democratic ensemble. He accepts Whitman's linguistic experiment of the collective poetic subject and yet enhances it to the level of socio-linguistic activism by pointing out the ideological aspect inherent in the dominant white-male-centered language. By way of Whitman, he basically indicates the irony of black intelligentsia's “New Negro” cultural movement. For Hughes, such efforts to create a new image of black personality and promote black middle class values add nothing to positive self-consciousness of black people because it is impossible to construct a consistently positive black self on the symbolic system of white-centered culture in which black people exist as a lack. Ultimately, he moves beyond Whitman's language experiment by opening the boundary of his poetic text and encouraging readers to occupy freely the space of poetic subject. Readers, by performing Hughes's poems, bring in semiotic pulsion to refuse ideological social apparatuses including race, class, and gender, and become reborn as a new subject-in-process. In this respect Hughes clearly manifests what Mikhail Bakhtin calls “polyphony” in his poetic text and becomes the direct descendent of Whitman among other poets.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (13)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0