메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
홍익대학교 법학연구소 홍익법학 홍익법학 제19권 제2호
발행연도
2018.1
수록면
451 - 471 (21page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Since the first comprehensive competition law was adopted in 1981, the Korean competition regime has developed the distinctive features of fair competition laws, demonstrating the socio-political goal of ‘economic democratisation’. The KFTC has applied Article 23 of the Korean competition act to achieve the multiple goals of the Korean competition regime. In particular, the development and enforcement of the Fair Transactions in Subcontracting Act (FTSA) highlight the rigorous governmental intervention in the private subcontracts for protecting a weaker party. In effect, the topic of FTSA has become one of the important themes as the number of cases has recently increased. In addition, there have been notable amendments to the Korean FTSA. However, some critics assert that excessive intervention can harm the process of individual freedom of contract and private autonomy. In particular, the issue relating to the practice of ‘fixing unreasonable consideration’ has been a hotly debated topic. There have been numerous cases for interpreting the scope of fixing unreasonable consideration in the industry of shipbuilding, and the Supreme Court judgment on DSME has provided the scope of application of this provision, which provides guidance for subcontracting parties. Therefore, it is timely to discuss the meaning of fixing unreasonable consideration and the problem of applying the relevant rule by looking at the recent case law.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (29)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0