메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국질서경제학회 질서경제저널 질서경제저널 제18권 제1호
발행연도
2015.1
수록면
91 - 110 (20page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Innovation as a key element for development and economic growth is undisputed. In addition to extensive market conditions, the human resources have always been regarded as an important parameter. The strong involvement is the reason why HRM practices as an aspect of human resources are increasingly recognized as an important element for innovation. This paper focuses on the human resource management (HRM) practices and their association with innovation. It is investigated whether it is better to adopt as many practices as possible or whether individual HRM practices are particularly relevant. The human resources are involved in the entire innovation process and are therefore increasingly recognized as an important element for innovation. However, the interaction of HRM practices and innovation is barely considered in both, the HRM and the innovation literature. The results of an Ordered Probit regression show a significantly positive correlation between HRM practices and innovation activities, especially for practices related to payment and communication. Thereby, HRM practices are especially crucial for highly innovative companies. In addition to the positive association of certain HRM groups, differences depending on the strength of the innovation activities can be found. For a more precise description of the complex innovation processes, the description of the innovation activities is based on several innovation related variables. Considering the resulting four types of innovators, the correlation with Pioneers is much stronger than with the less innovative group of Small innovators. In addition, the results for all equations are significantly more negative for Non-Innovators than for Adapters. In addition, an HRM regime using practices of all HRM areas has the highest positive association, but a linear ranking of HRM regimes cannot be found. Hence, the more the merrier does not necessarily apply. Rather, the correct combination of HRM practices seems to be crucial. A perspective for future research is the analysis of this combination as well as potential repercussion effects of innovation activities on the structure of HRM strategies using panel data.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (28)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0