메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국생물교육학회 생물교육 생물교육 제36권 제1호
발행연도
2008.1
수록면
26 - 39 (14page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Since graphing is a powerful tool in science for analyzing data and communicating quantitative information, and graphing ability is an important component of scientific literacy, nurturing graphing abilities is a major objective in science education. However, many students find graph-related activities to be difficult. In order to investigate this problem, a diagnosis of students learning processes, teaching materials and teaching methods is required. In this study, Korean middle school science textbooks are analyzed regarding the types of graph and the types and difficulty level of graphing activities contained by science contents(energy, matter, life, earth) and grade levels(7th, 8th, 9th). The results showed that the line graph was most frequently used(80%) and that there was limited variation in the types of graphs used. The types of graph were different depending on science contents. There was no trend observed between grade level and the types of graph used because the content of each chapter differed from grade to grade. Second, results showed that there were many graph constructing activities although there was more emphasis put on graph interpreting activities(63%) than graph constructing activities(37%). Such interpreting activities were also found to be most frequently required for subjects relating to matter(32%) and earth(25%), whereas constructing activities were more frequently required for subjects relating to matter(48%) and energy(38%). Both types of graphing activity were least used for subject relating to life. A requirement for both types of graphing activity was most frequently found in the 8th grade. Lastly, activities of interpreting relationship between 2 graphs were used more in subject related matter(39%) and life(36%). And no guidance was most used for subject relating to matter(69%) and guidance of variables was most used for subjects relating to matter(47%) and energy(42%). Guidance of axes was most used for subjects relating to energy(46%) and matter(43%) and guidance of scales was most used for subjects relating to matter(44%). Also no trend between activity level and grade level was observed for graph interpreting and constructing activities.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (21)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0