지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2015.1
- 수록면
- 347 - 363 (17page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper examines the relevance of logics for transferring Operational Controlauthority (OPCON) from the CFC (ROK-U.S. Combined Forces Command) anddraws several lessons for South Korea in order not to repeat the same mistakes.
For this purpose, it explains the background of OPCON and compares the logicswith the reality unfolded so far.
The political leaders in the Roh administration pursued transition of OPCON in thename of sovereignty in 2003. However, OPCON authority is nothing but a tool toensure the unity of command in military operations and it is not regarded as aninfringement on sovereignty. The Roh administration promised to strengthenSouth Korean forces to lead the defense of South Korea through comprehensivedefense reform efforts, but failed to accomplish them. Though they expected threatsfrom North Korea would diminish gradually to be favorable to the transition, NorthKorea appears to have succeeded in developing several nuclear weapons.
As a lesson, South Korea should understand that most countries in the world donot consider the delegation of OPCON as an infringement of national sovereignty.
South Korea should focus on defense preparedness against the North Korean nuclearthreat by making the CFC the key player for the combined nuclear deterrence. Inthe long run, South Korea should speed up its defense reform efforts in order totake a leading role in the combined defense posture with the U.S. forces and tryto reflect people’s yearning for self-reliance. At the same time, the ROK and theUnited States should try to adopt measures that could ease South Korean people’sdemand for self-reliance within the current CFC structure.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (32)
참고문헌 신청
/ / Agreed minutes and amendment thereto between the governments of the Republic of Korea and the United States of America relating to continued cooperation in economic and military
/ / Joint Communique of the 44th ROK-U.S. Security Consultative Meeting
/ / Joint Communique of the 45th ROK-U.S. Security Consultative Meeting
/ 2014 / Joint Communique of the 46th ROK-U.S. Security Consultative Meeting
Bruce Klingner / 2011 / The Case for Comprehensive Missile Defense in Asia / The Heritage Foundation Backgrounder (2506) : 3 ~
/ / Joint Communique of the 44th ROK-U.S. Security Consultative Meeting
/ / Joint Communique of the 45th ROK-U.S. Security Consultative Meeting
/ 2014 / Joint Communique of the 46th ROK-U.S. Security Consultative Meeting
Bruce Klingner / 2011 / The Case for Comprehensive Missile Defense in Asia / The Heritage Foundation Backgrounder (2506) : 3 ~
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
The Transition of Wartime Operational Control for Entering a New Era
The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis
2021 .01
-
작전통제권 전환 결정과정 및 영향요소에 관한 분석
국방정책연구
2020 .01
-
전작권 전환: 미래 연합사 체제에 대한 비판적 고찰
국방정책연구
2021 .10
-
한국군 한미연합사령관 체제의 예상되는 문제점과 과제 : 노력통일(unity of effort)을 중심으로
국제정치연구
2019 .06
-
한국군 전작권 전환 이후 연합 및 상부지휘구조 발전방향
한국국가전략
2021 .11
-
나토와 한미동맹의 군사지휘체제 비교: 지휘관계를 중심으로
한국군사학논집
2019 .06
-
Demystifying the U.S.–ROK Command and Control Structure: How “OPCON Transfer” Can Advance the Unity of Effort on the Korean Peninsula
The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis
2018 .01
-
The 50th US-ROK Security Consultative Meeting(SCM) and Tasks Ahead: Focusing on Wartime Operational Control (OPCON) Transfer
IFANS FOCUS
2018 .11
-
Has the Operational Control Transfer of the ROK‐US Alliance Come to the Cul‐de‐sac? International and Domestic Factors That Explain Delays in an Alliance Policy
Pacific Focus
2024 .08
-
Synchronizing Two Asymmetrical Deals: The Panmunjeom Declaration and the US-DPRK Joint Statement from Japan's Perspective
The Korean Journal of Security Affairs
2018 .12
-
전작권 전환정책 변동요인 분석
한국군사학논집
2022 .06
-
전작권 전환 대비 한·미 공보협력체계 발전방향
국방정책연구
2019 .01
-
작전통제권 환수결정 변화요인 연구 : 인식된 순위협의 변화를 중심으로
한국군사학논집
2015 .02
-
저작권 전환과 유엔사
계간 외교
2020 .01
-
A Study on the Decision to Establish the ROK-US Combined Forces Command during the Carter Administration, 1977-1978
Journal of Peace and Unification
2023 .05
-
Readjustment of ROK-US Alliance and Strategic Effects of the USFK
The Korean Journal of Security Affairs
2019 .01
-
한 · 미 및 조 · 중 연합군사지휘체제 비교 연구 : 역사적 제도주의 관점을 중심으로
아세아연구
2019 .06
-
2010년대 북한의 도발과 한국 전쟁지도체제의 대응 분석
한국군사학논집
2020 .10
-
미국의 피지배외국법인(CFC)세제에 대한 연구
조세학술논집
2019 .12
-
The Function of South Korea in Obama's Pivot to Asia : OPCON and THAAD
한국동북아논총
2016 .06
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0