메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
신승규 (상명대학교)
저널정보
육군사관학교 화랑대연구소 한국군사학논집 한국군사학논집 제78권 제2호
발행연도
2022.6
수록면
269 - 299 (31page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
On June 25, 1950, following the outbreak of the war in Invasion from North Korea, the United Nations established the United States-led U.N. Command and delegated the appointment of commander to the U.S. On June 27, U.S. and other U.N. forces entered the war, and on July 14, the operational command over the South Korean military has been transferred to the commander of the U.N. This was the beginning of the transition of wartime operational control(hereinafter referred to as wartime OPCON), and after the truce, the policy of transferring wartime OPCON back to our military brought about different policy changes such as 『policy transition–policy period postponement–Re-postponement by suggesting policy conditions–(Goals for) policy transition within the term』for each government.
With different policy results from each government, the research questions I raised are "What are the variable factors in the transition policy of wartime OPCON?", "What is the key variable factor?" and "Why is the policy in progress without termination?". Based on these, I analyzed the main factors influencing the change in policy decisions through a review of cases of policy changes. In other words, first, in terms of security environment factor, the ROK-U.S. alliance, changes in the U.S. military strategy, the state of conflict among neighboring countries, and the level of threat from North Korea, etc. Second, in terms of the political support alliance, major issues include military sovereignty versus military efficiency, South Korean military capability, and defense budget. Third, in terms of policy flow, policy issues are pros and cons for the transition of wartime OPCON by government, alternatives to policy are alternatives to solving the policy issues, and political trends are variable factors such as government ideological propensity(progress or conservative). These factors had a significant impact on the variance in the transition policy of wartime OPCON policy, but the key factor was the ‘government"s propensity and leader"s perception of the situation.’ Meanwhile, policy characteristics, national survival issues, ROK-U.S. issues and public opinion issues were cited as reasons why the transition policy of wartime OPCON has not been terminated while it has been in the process of policy changes for more than 20 years.
As such, this study presents policy implications for policy changes(innovation, maintenance, succession, and termination) and prospects for the transition policy of wartime OPCON, based on the policy change factors of the three governments analyzed in this paper and the Moon Jae In government’s progress.

목차

ABSTRACT
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 및 연구 방법
Ⅲ. 전작권 전환정책 변동 사례 연구
Ⅳ. 전작권 전환정책 변동요인 분석
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0