메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
전북대학교 동북아법연구소 동북아법연구 동북아법연구 제4권 제1호
발행연도
2010.1
수록면
377 - 404 (28page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The ultimate aim of securities regulation is to promote full disclosure to investors. It means the markets are fully informed to the extent practicable and that securities prices reflect the mix of publicly available information. With full disclosure as the basic premise of the Financial Investment Services and Capital Markets Act, it has developed that investors should have equal access to information. Trading securities on the source of material information not disclosed publicly gives a trader an unfair advantage over other investors that runs counter to the premise of securities law. Insider trading deprives investors of the oppurtunity to invest under fair competition that should exist in the securities markets because the informational advantage is based upon information that is not publicly available, someone has unbalanced superior information power. This article tries to examine one important unresolved issue identifying the circumstances under which persons who are not traditional corporate insiders will be held accountable for what has become known as “outsider trading.”Even though outsider trading can take a variety of forms, this paper focuses on either (1) when an investor acquires information from a company or from someone else with the expectation that the information will be kept confidential; or (2) when outsiders obtain the information through certain types of wrongful conduct, including theft or hacking. And then, it suggests a German Securities Act type which regulates all trading under material nonpublic information.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (19)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0