메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국법정책학회 법과 정책연구 법과 정책연구 제4권 제2호
발행연도
2004.12
수록면
571 - 593 (23page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Penal Code Article 24 defines consent of victim as follows "An act which infringes a legal interest with the consent of one who is authorized to dispose of such interest shall not be punishable except as otherwise provide by law." Therefore, It is regarded as one of justification defences. Whenever consent of victim maybe a defence, it must be established that: (i) the legal interest was disposed by the party who has authorization of consent (ii) the consent was freely given by the party who was legally capable of consenting, (iii) the consent existed, at least, at the time of acting, (iv) the party acknowledge the consent (v) the act based on the consent is applicable to social rules. Therefore, If the consent of victim has occurred by fraud, misunderstanding, duress, etc.. The effectiveness of consent of victim is in doubt because the consent it is not freely given and voluntarily. Hence, In this paper, I studied and reviewed, in the case of the consent of victim by fraud, misunderstanding, what contents of fraud or misunderstanding negate the consent of victim based on the discussion and debate in the foreign nations.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (17)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0