메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국기업법학회 기업법연구 企業法硏究 第21卷 第4號
발행연도
2007.12
수록면
355 - 383 (29page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Since the Korea-U.S. Free Trade Agreements (hereinafter “FTA”) was signed in 2007, it seemed to be inevitable to introduce consent order system in Korea. A consent order is a series of executive procedure expressing a voluntary agreement between two potential parties - a defendant being investigated especially for unfair trade practices and the government regulatory body - to a law suit. That is, without admitting guilt, the defendant might agree to cease the activities alleged by the government to be illegal, in return for closing the case. At the same time, the government might efficiently accomplish regulatory purposes thereby.
This article tries to give some significant advices in introducing the institution of the “Consent order” in Korea from the standpoint of the domestic legal system. For that purpose, the article explores the definition, institutional characters and functions, and other relevant information of the consent order system. Given that inquiry, it discusses some issues and alternatives that should be considered in relation to the Bill for『Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act』on August 7, 2007. Specifically, the article maintains that the institutional advantages of “Consent order” should not wrongfully be taken as to be adding another arbitrary leverage to apply rules to the existing list of measures for government's intervention. It is necessary to deliberate the possibilities of moral hazard, unpredictability of the government affairs, or the government’s over-regulation problems which may follow the “Consent order” system. These problems, however, can be solved by existing rules or procedural-complements, such as making public the agreement reached between the parties or having a certain period of time seeking public comments related to the “Consent order”.
In sum, the “Consent order” system should be introduced in Korea as a form that fits well into the domestic legal system. For that purpose, it is highly recommendable to refer to the “Consent order” practiced in the U.S., where the system originated from. The Bill『Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act』of 2007 proves to be by and large a very positive one, in which sets institutional devices to soften unexpected impacts of the new system. Nonetheless, there still remain some shortcomings, such as limitation of scope to apply “Consent order” and exclusion of a defendant’s right to advance opinions.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 동의명령제도 일반
Ⅲ. 동의명령제도 도입방안
Ⅳ. 결론
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉

참고문헌 (33)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-366-016215016