메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국의학교육학회 Korean Journal of Medical Education Korean Journal of Medical Education 제27권 제1호
발행연도
2015.1
수록면
11 - 18 (8page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of the peer review in an integrated curriculum and to guide furtherimprovements of curriculum. Methods: In 2012, Seoul National University College of Medicine implemented a peer review system for 11 courses in an integratedcurriculum. For each lecture, two reviewers conducted the rating using a 10-item questionnaire on a 4-point scale. We analyzedthe correlation between total scores and each item and the inter-rater reliability between the two reviewers by Pearson correlation. Further, the link between peer review scores and the student lecture evaluation was analyzed. Results: The mean total score for the checklist rating was 31.3 (out of 40.0), and the mean score for each item ranged from 2.65to 3.35 (out of 4.00). The correlation coefficient between the total score and each item was high, ranging from 0.656 to 0.849,except for three items. The mean of difference scores between reviewers was 5.03, and the correlation coefficient was significantlyhigh, which ranged from 0.968 to 0.999. The peer reviews scores and student lecture evaluations generally correlated, but therewere some outlying exceptions; the correlation coefficient was 0.105 and 0.093. Conclusion: Peer review is a useful method for improving the quality of lectures in an integrated curriculum by monitoring theobjectives, contents, and methods of the lectures and providing feedback to the professors.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (20)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0