지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 한국역사연구회 역사와현실 역사와 현실 제113호
- 발행연도
- 2019.9
- 수록면
- 293 - 341 (49page)
- DOI
- 10.35865/YWH.2019.09.113.293
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Both Kings Chung’ryeol and Chungseon had Jaeshin and Miljik dignitaries man posts inside the traditional Six “Bu” Ministries(“Yukbu”), the “Eosadae” Monitor office and the “Samsa” office (in charge of financial spending). By having them assume those posts in a specific manner, they tried to run their governments in their own ways. But there were some problems in king Chung’ryeol’s way of linking individual offices with either Jaeshin or Miljik figures. And king Chungseon apparently wanted to fix some of those problems, as he positioned human resources in a fashion different from his own father’s.
King Chungseon wanted to expand the group of Jaeshin figures who were allowed to man high-ranking Six ministerial posts (the Advisory “Pansa” post and the Resident “Sangseo” post), from only the first and second Jaeshin figures (as it had been during king Chung’ryeol’s days) to middle and even junior ones, while also broadening the range of Miljik figures from junior and mid-level ones to high-ranking senior ones. This move on Chungseon’s part allowed both the Jaeshin and Miljik figures to increase their influence in the operations of the ‘Bu’ Ministries, but at the same time the Ministries as well were able to reinforce their status and voice in dynastic governing, with [more diverse] Jaeshin figures and [more high-ranking] Miljik figures newly helming the ministries.
In the meantime, Chungseon decided not to allow Jaeshin figures to man either the advisory Chief Monitor(Eosadae [called ‘Gamchalsa’ these days] Pansa) seat [except the First Jaeshin] or the resident Head Monitor(Gamchal Daebu) seat, and refrained from appointing junior Miljik figures to the Gamchal Daebu (which was also called Daesaheon some times) seat as well, with the intention of further ensuring autonomous control of the Eosadae (named Saheonbu at the time) office itself. While doing so, he still allowed higher level of Miljik figures to assume the post of resident Head Monitor(Eosa Daebu/Daesaheon), in order to maintain necessary amount of power and influence required by the office to do its original job, monitoring and prosecuting.
And in running the Samsa office, Chungseon had both mid-level Jaeshin and Miljik figures to man the resident Head commissioner(Samsa-sa) seat in several occasions. Evidently, he must have reasoned that in the appointment of seats in that office, alternating between Jaeshin and Miljik figures would enable both of them to place their counterparts in check, and prevent the other party from wielding too much power, in deliberations concerning financial spending.
All these agendas featured in king Chungseon’s positioning of human resources inside the Goryeo government may have caused inconveniences, discomfort and even dissension among governmental officials. And that may have had something to do with the negative portrayal of king Chungseon’s political governance in Goryeo-sa and other records.
King Chungseon wanted to expand the group of Jaeshin figures who were allowed to man high-ranking Six ministerial posts (the Advisory “Pansa” post and the Resident “Sangseo” post), from only the first and second Jaeshin figures (as it had been during king Chung’ryeol’s days) to middle and even junior ones, while also broadening the range of Miljik figures from junior and mid-level ones to high-ranking senior ones. This move on Chungseon’s part allowed both the Jaeshin and Miljik figures to increase their influence in the operations of the ‘Bu’ Ministries, but at the same time the Ministries as well were able to reinforce their status and voice in dynastic governing, with [more diverse] Jaeshin figures and [more high-ranking] Miljik figures newly helming the ministries.
In the meantime, Chungseon decided not to allow Jaeshin figures to man either the advisory Chief Monitor(Eosadae [called ‘Gamchalsa’ these days] Pansa) seat [except the First Jaeshin] or the resident Head Monitor(Gamchal Daebu) seat, and refrained from appointing junior Miljik figures to the Gamchal Daebu (which was also called Daesaheon some times) seat as well, with the intention of further ensuring autonomous control of the Eosadae (named Saheonbu at the time) office itself. While doing so, he still allowed higher level of Miljik figures to assume the post of resident Head Monitor(Eosa Daebu/Daesaheon), in order to maintain necessary amount of power and influence required by the office to do its original job, monitoring and prosecuting.
And in running the Samsa office, Chungseon had both mid-level Jaeshin and Miljik figures to man the resident Head commissioner(Samsa-sa) seat in several occasions. Evidently, he must have reasoned that in the appointment of seats in that office, alternating between Jaeshin and Miljik figures would enable both of them to place their counterparts in check, and prevent the other party from wielding too much power, in deliberations concerning financial spending.
All these agendas featured in king Chungseon’s positioning of human resources inside the Goryeo government may have caused inconveniences, discomfort and even dissension among governmental officials. And that may have had something to do with the negative portrayal of king Chungseon’s political governance in Goryeo-sa and other records.
목차
머리말
1. 재추와 6부[4사, 3부]의 관계
2. 재추와 어사대[감찰사, 사헌부]의 관계
3. 재추와 삼사의 관계
맺음말
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (26)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
고려 충렬~충정왕대의 밀직-재신 간 轉職 양상 검토
한국사학보
2019 .08
-
고려 충숙왕대 인사정책 연구 : 재추의 관직겸임 양상을 중심으로
역사학보
2019 .12
-
고려 충선왕대의 문산계 개편 및 이후의 변화
대동문화연구
2022 .03
-
Another Look at the Portrait of Yi Je-hyeon, a Gift of King Chungseon
Korea Journal
2024 .06
-
해군 부대 슬로건의 문채 연구
인문언어
2021 .12
-
고려 충선왕의 직물생산 전략 연구
한국사연구
2018 .03
-
고려시대 경주 기림사(祇林寺)의 위상과 소속변화
한국사연구
2021 .09
-
한국 한시의 괴물 형상에 대한 일고찰
우리어문연구
2016 .01
-
한국기독교역사연구소 ‘인물’ 연구 동향과 과제
한국기독교와 역사
2023 .03
-
충렬왕대 文散階의 복원과 운영 : 大夫階를 중심으로
역사와실학
2016 .04
-
역사서술에서 繪畫性과 心理的 要因 －鄭杜熙의 人物史 硏究: 새로운 방법론의 모색과 가치지향성－
서강인문논총
2023 .08
-
영어 의미구조의 개념화: 전경-배경 조직을 중심으로
언어과학연구
2022 .09
-
고려 내 다루가치의 존재 양상과 영향 : 다루가치를 통한 몽골 지배방식의 경험
역사와현실
2016 .03
-
고려후기 提調類 관직의 도입과 의미
사학연구
2017 .09
-
Figure Precedence vs. Ground Precedence : With Reference to English and Korean
언어과학연구
2017 .12
-
충렬왕대 怯憐口(怯怜口) 출신 관원 : 몽골-고려 통혼관계의 한 단면
사학연구
2015 .06
-
원간섭기 근친금혼 관념의 강화와 수계혼(收繼婚) 도입 시도
역사와현실
2016 .03
-
고종 초년 합설 의정부의 직무와 위상
역사와현실
2015 .03
-
고려 성균관의 성립과 운영
사림
2020 .01
-
Next of “King”
Localities
2016 .11
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0