메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
연구보고서
저자정보
박진 (서울연구원) 김상균 (서울연구원)
저널정보
서울연구원 서울연구원 정책과제연구보고서 [서울연 2019-PR-34] 제3종시설물 안전관리제도 정착방안
발행연도
2019.12
수록면
1 - 115 (115page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The collapse of several buildings has caused social anxiety about an aging building. Further, 46% of buildings in Seoul are over 30 years old. Therefore, structural safety management for small-scale buildings is an important issue in Seoul. Recently, with revision of the law, third-class facility was implemented and mandatory management was extended to small buildings. Legally, this means that the number of private buildings under mandatory management has been increased. Management of third-class facility includes designation, pre-inspection, designation decision, safety inspection, and maintenance. As third-class facility is newly implemented and the system is in progress for the first time, a complete work should be improved based on the implications of the overall process.
At present, the average number of potential third-class facilities is 1,000 in each autonomous district in Seoul. Priority standards need to be established for efficient designation and management of the third-class facility. Problems have been identified in the national building DB, which is called Seumteo. There is no data value or the entered value does not meet the building codes. Therefore, Seoul’s building DB is needed to supplement the limitations of the national DB. Also, it is necessary to enhance the automatic linkage of facility management systems between Seoul and the nation.
Meaningful implications were found in the field study on pre-inspection. It was difficult to conduct pre-inspection due to closure of the entrance. It is necessary to send a notice to the owner, manager, or representative of the tenant, to inform them that the visit has not been carried out. Ultimately, administrative services are needed for appointments in advance between building managers and inspectors. In addition, it is necessary to set up a building representative in connection with the local manager for small buildings without a building manager. This saves the time that is unnecessarily utilised during the pre-inspection process, and thus, efficient inspection can be performed.
Citizens have little awareness about pre-inspection, and the inspector is now guiding the purpose of the visit and the details of the inspection and seeking co-operation. Through public relations, supplementary measures should be taken together, such as raising public awareness of building safety management and providing means to enforce it. This needs to be improved because it is also connected with safety inspection after final designation of the third-class facility.
During pre-inspection, it is difficult to confirm because the main components are covered with internal and external finishing materials. The Seoul Metropolitan Government should prepare a criterion for the case so that there is no difference in the result grade for each inspector or building. If a building is in a vulnerable area or an accurate diagnosis is required, it is necessary to use a non-destructive inspection as a complementary means. There is a need to find ways to link building remodelling or interior work with safety inspections.
Public awareness about private building safety management should be improved. Self check should allow building owners, and managers to be interested in the building and understand its condition. In particular, awareness about the necessity of building safety management should be extended to private building owners.

목차

[표지]
[요약]
2018년 용산구 건물 붕괴 등 민간건축물 사고로 안전관리 허점 노출
새 법 시행으로 건축물 안전관리에 민간 역할·책임, 지자체 업무 증가
제도 시행 과정에서 도출되는 문제점 파악해 개선방안 마련이 연구목적
임의관리대상 민간건축물, 서울시 관계부서 간 업무분담의 명확화 필요
‘노약자, 다중이용, 소방취약 특성’ 제3종시설물부터 우선 조사·관리해야
관리누락 없게 건축물 자료 재정비하고 정부·서울시 자료와 시스템 연계
제3종시설물 실태조사 방법, 강제수단 마련 등 현실에 맞게 보완할 필요
민간건축물 안전관리 위한 시민 인식 개선하고 신고요령도 안내 바람직
[목차]
표목차
그림 목차
[01. 연구개요]
1_연구배경 및 목적
2_연구내용 및 방법
[02. 제3종시설물 안전관리 법규와 서울시 건축물 안전관리 체계]
1_관련 법규
2_제3종시설물 관리 제도
3_서울시 건축물 안전관리 업무 체계
4_민간 건축물 안전점검 지원사업
5_안전관리체계에서 개선이 필요한 영역
[03. 서울시 제3종시설물 대상 건축물 분석]
1_서울시 건축물 현황
2_제3종시설물 지정 조사대상 건축물 현황
3_건축물 안전점검 전문가 현황
4_건축물 정보관리에서 주의가 필요한 영역
[04. 건축물 안전점검 실태조사 방법 분석]
1_건축물 안전점검 매뉴얼 분석
2_실태조사 현장에서 확인한 애로사항
3_실태조사 방법에서 개선이 요구되는 부분
[05. 제3종시설물 지정·관리체계 개선방안]
1_소규모 건축물 안전관리와 관련하여 본 연구의 발견점
2_개선방안
[참고문헌]
[부록]
[Abstract]
[Contents]

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2020-359-000678813