메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
영국사학회 영국 연구 영국 연구 제42호
발행연도
2019.1
수록면
21 - 54 (34page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
In Stuart historiography, the publications of Richard Montagu’s Arminian books in 1624-5 have been regarded as one of the most notable instantiations of the religious crisis resulting in the outbreak of the English civil war. John Morrill’s much-quoted dictum that the civil war was essentially a war of religion would have been bolstered by a closer examination of the Montagu controversy. Yet while religion was an important agenda to explain the crisis of the realm on the eve of Charles I’s Personal Rule, why it was one remains untold in current historiography. Taking into account the distinctiveness of the English constitution can help to fill this gap. The language of the royal directives including proclamations and declarations in 1626-9 demonstrates that Charles I’s government maintained a conservative stance towards the Montagu controversy, adhering to the existing articles of religion as they had been established under Elizabethan rule. At a time when the common law was failing to fulfill its expected role as a dependable source of authority, how to determine the criteria of religious orthodoxy was not easy to sort out. The proceedings of the House of Commons in 1626 indicate that the Lower House sought to do that, encroaching upon the authority of Convocation, and this became the culprit in the constitutional breakdown of Caroline England.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0