메뉴 건너뛰기
Library Notice
Institutional Access
If you certify, you can access the articles for free.
Check out your institutions.
ex)Hankuk University, Nuri Motors
Log in Register Help KOR
Subject

New Directions for Housing Stock Management Policy in Seoul
Recommendations
Search
Questions

서울시 주거상황 감안한 주택재고 관리정책 방향

논문 기본 정보

Type
Research report
Author
Eun-Cheol Park (서울연구원) Hye-Rim Yoon (서울연구원)
Journal
The Seoul Institute 서울연구원 정책과제연구보고서 [서울연 2020-PR-19]
Published
2020.9
Pages
1 - 136 (136page)

Usage

cover
📌
Topic
📖
Background
🔬
Method
🏆
Result
New Directions for Housing Stock Management Policy in Seoul
Ask AI
Recommendations
Search
Questions

Abstract· Keywords

Report Errors
The housing policy of the Seoul Metropolitan Government focused on expanding the supply of new homes during the period of high growth. As a result, it preferred demolition and redevelopment to repairs and improvements for the purpose of increasing the housing stock in Seoul. However, the potential economic growth is slowing down today, and it is expected that the number of households is going to decrease after the mid-2030s, as is the population. Around 3.9% of total housing stock in Seoul consists of ageing stock whose administrative durability periods exceed their economic durability periods. If there is no supply of new homes in the future, this proportion will likely increase up to 5.7% in five years and up to 11.4% in 10 years. In the era of low growth, it is important that housing stock be reserved and managed properly, not only by providing newly-built houses, but also by promoting the quality of used houses.
In order to increase the durability of existing houses and promote voluntary improvements and renovations by homeowners, the housing stock management policy of Seoul city needs to follow three principles. First, the administrative durability periods of buildings should be gradually set to be equal to the economic durability periods. Second, the goal of housing stock management should be set up as the achievement of long-lasting buildings with a focus on health, safety, and habitability (incl. barrier-free design and energy efficiency). Third, the response and management for ageing stock should maintain a balance between point- and area-based approaches.
This research provides three new directions for achieving the goal of housing stock management. First, housing improvement and renovation assistance programs need to be improved. It is necessary to modify the requirements for housing improvement assistance and to make an upward adjustment of the administrative durability period. With this policy goal taken into account, programs should establish their targets properly, as well as the types and contents of improvement work. In addition, incentives for housing improvement need to be complimented by the introduction of tax-cuts and an increased limit of the amount of improvement work assistance. In the long run, it is desirable that Seoul city operates the investigation and assessment system used to evaluate the qualities and performances of houses.
Second, a systematic organisation and operation system is needed to establish a better housing improvement system. It is recommended that two divisions in the Seoul Metropolitan Government, that is, the Housing Policy Division and the Residential Environment Improvement Division, cooperate with each other to establish housing improvement governance of local communities. A quality certification system for housing improvement companies would help build public confidence in their works. In the long term, it would be extremely useful to set up a housing inventory management system that manages a database containing all relevant data and information such as construction, improvement, maintenance, etc.
Third, transactions of used houses need to be promoted by modifying relevant institutions. It is necessary to upgrade the current certification standard, such as by establishing long-lasting building conditions, and it ought to be ensured that a new standard can be met through housing improvements and renovations. The public assistance that can be provided in housing transactions should be reinforced to create a situation where improvements or renovations can be carried out when transactions involving used houses occur.

Contents

[표지]
[요약]
주택의 신규공급·재고관리 균형있게 추진하는 정책으로 전환이 필요
저출산·고령화·저성장시대 재고관리 정책목표는 주택 장수명화·성능향상
경제적 내용연수 초과한 서울의 노후주택 비율은 호수 기준으로 3.9%
서울의 주택재고 관리정책·지원프로그램은 종합적·체계적이지 못한 실정
선진국은 시장가치 있는 양질의 주택재고 늘리는 정책 종합적으로 추진
주택소유자의 자발적 주택개량·리모델링 활성화 지원하는 정책이 필수적
주택개량·리모델링 제도, 현실적 수요 반영해 지원기준·절차 개선할 필요
주택개량 관련 조직·운영 체계화하고, 주택이력정보 시스템 구축 바람직
장수명주택 인증제도 개선 등 중고주택 거래 활성화 위한 지원책 세워야
[목차]
표 목차
그림 목차
[01 연구개요]
1_ 연구배경 및 목적
2_ 연구내용 및 방법
[02 주택재고 관리의 의의와 목표]
1_ 주택재고 관리의 의의
2_ 주택재고 관리의 목표
[03 주거상황과 주택재고 관리정책]
1_ 사회경제적 여건 변화와 서울의 주택재고
2_ 서울시민의 주거상황 및 수준
3_ 주택재고 관리정책의 현황과 문제점
[04 주요 선진국의 주택재고 관리정책]
1_ 영국의 주택적응·개량 지원정책
2_ 일본의 주택개량 및 리모델링 지원제도
[05 주택재고 관리정책의 방향]
1_ 재고관리정책의 목표와 방향
2_ 주택재고 관리정책의 과제와 프로그램
[참고문헌]
[Abstract]
[Contents]

References (0)

Add References

Recommendations

It is an article recommended by DBpia according to the article similarity. Check out the related articles!

Related Authors

Frequently Viewed Together

Recently viewed articles

Comments(0)

0

Write first comments.