지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
It is often thought that the reason for Japanese learners" misuse according to the omission of 「-te kuru」and 「-te kureru」is not the matter of benefit, but the directionality of verbs. In this context, this study analyzes the semantic function of “-te kuru”/“-te kureru” and “-eo oda”/“-eo juda” from the viewpoint of verbal directionality. A survey was conducted targeting native Japanese speakers, native Korean speakers, and Korean learners of Japanese, in order to clarify similarities and differences between the two languages.
In the analysis, the Japanese verbs are classified into 6 types - subject movement verbs 1, 2, and 3, and object movement verbs 1, 2, and 3 - according to the type of movement, and the necessity of 「-te kuru」and 「-te kureru」is verified. In addition, similarities and differences in comparison with the Korean equivalents “-eo oda” and “-eo juda” are also explored. The result of the survey conducted under the comparative study shows that the Japanese language has a high frequency of 「-te kuru」or 「-te kureru」, except in subject movement verb 3, and it is necessary to use these expressions. The result is as expected. In the case of the Korean language, the expressions in question tend to be used alone, except in subject movement verb 1. In general, no common tendency was found. In the Korean language, it is considered that the necessity of “-eo oda” and “-eo juda” differs depending on words, and those verbs alone do not indicate directionality. The answers from the Korean learners shows that subject movement verbs 1 and 2, and object movement verb 3 are frequently misused. The preference Korean learners between these expressions, as well as the strong tendency Korean native speaker shows in their choice of expressions, suggests influence from their mother language.
In the analysis, the Japanese verbs are classified into 6 types - subject movement verbs 1, 2, and 3, and object movement verbs 1, 2, and 3 - according to the type of movement, and the necessity of 「-te kuru」and 「-te kureru」is verified. In addition, similarities and differences in comparison with the Korean equivalents “-eo oda” and “-eo juda” are also explored. The result of the survey conducted under the comparative study shows that the Japanese language has a high frequency of 「-te kuru」or 「-te kureru」, except in subject movement verb 3, and it is necessary to use these expressions. The result is as expected. In the case of the Korean language, the expressions in question tend to be used alone, except in subject movement verb 1. In general, no common tendency was found. In the Korean language, it is considered that the necessity of “-eo oda” and “-eo juda” differs depending on words, and those verbs alone do not indicate directionality. The answers from the Korean learners shows that subject movement verbs 1 and 2, and object movement verb 3 are frequently misused. The preference Korean learners between these expressions, as well as the strong tendency Korean native speaker shows in their choice of expressions, suggests influence from their mother language.
목차
Abstract
1. はじめに
2. 方向性を表す補助動詞に関する先行研究
3. 方向性による動詞の分類
4.「~てくる」「~てくれる」と「-어 오다」「-어 주다」の比較
5. 本研究における調査の内容
6. 調査結果と考察
7. まとめ
参考文献
REFERENCES
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
日本語の授受表現の韓国語翻訳に関する考察 : 「～てあげる」「～てくれる」「～てもらう」を中心に
일어일문학
2017 .05
-
日本語授受表現における動詞コロケーションの意味類型について ─ 大規模コーパスを用いて ─
日本語敎育
2017 .01
-
｢~てくれる/~てもらう｣문의 사용상황 분석 - 한국어와의 대응관계를 통하여 -
일본어문학
2024 .08
-
授受補助動詞の日韓対照研究 ─ 「～てくれる」と「-어 주다」のモダリティ的機能─
대한일어일문학회 학술대회 발표논문 요지집
2022 .11
-
동사 ‘주다’, ‘받다’의 의미 확장과 의미 대응 양상
담화와인지
2018 .02
-
「～てくれる」と「-어 주다(～テクレル)」の「恩恵」と「皮肉」
일어일문학
2020 .08
-
Japanese V-te V Compounds as Post-Syntactic Compounds
생성문법연구
2016 .01
-
언어 민감도 고양을 통한 배려하는 말하기 태도 교육 내용 탐색: 보조 용언 ‘주다’를 중심으로
화법연구
2017 .08
-
授受動詞の＜皮肉＞用法に関する日韓対照研究 ― 「皮肉」のメカニズムに注目して ―
일본학보
2018 .01
-
意図を表す補助動詞「~てやる」の韓・日対照研究
일어일문학연구
2018 .01
-
親しい友人にものを借りる際の意識の日韓比較 : 大学生を対象として
한국일본어학회 학술발표회
2017 .09
-
説明場面における授受補助動詞の使用様相 – ｢テモラウ․テイタダク表現｣を中心に –
일본연구
2024 .09
-
通过韩国语补助动词“주다2”看汉语的隐性特质
중국언어연구
2015 .01
-
日本語の方向性と主観的把握（その2）-「行く·来る」「やる·くれる」の対照歴史地理学 -
일본어학연구
2022 .12
-
プレゼンテーション準備段階での教師コメントの分析 : 上級会話授業を対象に
한국일본어학회 학술발표회
2018 .03
-
学習者の発想を活かした日本語作文指導 - 日本語寮韓国人学生を対象に -
대한일어일문학회 학술대회 발표논문 요지집
2021 .04
-
縦断的コ-パスに見られるテイナイ形の習得 : 韓国語 · 中国語母語話者を対象に
한국일본어학회 학술발표회
2018 .03
-
学習環境による条件表現の習得状況に関する考察 - 韓国人日本語学習者を対象に -
대한일어일문학회 학술대회 발표논문 요지집
2019 .04
-
大学の日本語教育におけるラーニングブリッチングの必要性 -韓国人留学生を対象に-
한국일본어학회 학술발표회
2020 .09
-
ITPA 言語学習能力検査における日本語学習者の誤答分析 - 韓国語母語話者を対象に -
한국일본어학회 학술발표회
2024 .09
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2021-830-000083609