지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 강원대학교 비교법학연구소 강원법학 江原法學 제62권
- 발행연도
- 2021.2
- 수록면
- 321 - 357 (37page)
- DOI
- 10.18215/kwlr.2021.62..321
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
It is meaningful to check how the Equal Employment Act is understood and applied more than 30 years after the Equal Employment Act was enacted. In particular, Article 7, 8, 9, 10, and 11 of the same Act, which deals with equal opportunity guarantees and treatment of men and women in employment. Regarding Article 7(recruitment), 8(wages), 9(money other than wages), 10(education, placement and promotion), and 11(retirement age, retirement, and dismissal) of the same Act, the last revision was made on December 21, 2007.
As for the Equal Employment Act, academic discussions have so far been theoretically reviewed or approached in a comparative manner around specific issues. And research based on specific data on the effectiveness of the Equal Employment Act has been insufficient.
This legislative evaluation is conducted on whether equal opportunity guarantees in recruitment. It covers the issues on employment, wages, financial supply other than wages, education, placement and promotion, retirement, and dismissal
It is important to evaluate not only the impact of legislation on the economy but also on society and the environment for the socially disadvantaged. It is not easy to assess quantitatively, but it is important to ensure transparency by the way of possible multiple checks and an objective data-based legislative assessment
The research began with the collection and analysis of data on gender equality and discriminatory factors in male and female employment before the Enforcement of the Act on Gender Equality in 1987. And this research collected data on the status of male and female employment and the process of de-discrimination for about 23 years after the enforcement of the Act. In addition, due to the lack of prior research on specific recognition surveys on Articles 7, 8, 9, 10, and 11 of the Equal Employment Act, which deals with “equal opportunity guarantees and treatment of men and women in employment”, this research tried to collect the data.
As for the Equal Employment Act, academic discussions have so far been theoretically reviewed or approached in a comparative manner around specific issues. And research based on specific data on the effectiveness of the Equal Employment Act has been insufficient.
This legislative evaluation is conducted on whether equal opportunity guarantees in recruitment. It covers the issues on employment, wages, financial supply other than wages, education, placement and promotion, retirement, and dismissal
It is important to evaluate not only the impact of legislation on the economy but also on society and the environment for the socially disadvantaged. It is not easy to assess quantitatively, but it is important to ensure transparency by the way of possible multiple checks and an objective data-based legislative assessment
The research began with the collection and analysis of data on gender equality and discriminatory factors in male and female employment before the Enforcement of the Act on Gender Equality in 1987. And this research collected data on the status of male and female employment and the process of de-discrimination for about 23 years after the enforcement of the Act. In addition, due to the lack of prior research on specific recognition surveys on Articles 7, 8, 9, 10, and 11 of the Equal Employment Act, which deals with “equal opportunity guarantees and treatment of men and women in employment”, this research tried to collect the data.
목차
국문초록
Ⅰ. 들어가며
Ⅱ. 남녀고용평등법 기초분석
Ⅲ. 남녀고용평등법 제정 후 고용상 성차별 규제의 발전과정
Ⅳ. 입법평가의 결과 및 개선방안
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (33)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
남녀고용평등법상 동일가치노동 동일임금 원칙의 해석 및 개선방향
노동법학
2022 .09
-
입법형식과 입법평가
공법연구
2016 .12
-
사용자의 인사재량권과 육아휴직 복직자에 대한 인사발령의 적법성 -대법원 2022. 6. 30. 선고 2017두76005 판결, 대법원 2022. 9. 16. 선고 2019두38571 판결을 중심으로-
법학연구
2023 .03
-
입법평가제도의 발전과 입법평가기준에 관한 비교법적 연구
비교법연구
2022 .12
-
여성체육 관련 스포츠 법제의 검토
중앙법학
2015 .06
-
‘좋은 법률’을 통한 헌법가치 및 공익실현 방안에 관한 연구
비교법연구
2022 .08
-
입법교육의 지형과 대안
유럽헌법연구
2022 .04
-
인권을 중심으로 한 입법자의 입법형성권의 통제와 그 수단으로서 입법평가제도
공법학연구
2023 .02
-
입법평가제도의 대안으로서 규제심사의 확대가능성에 대한 헌법적 검토
공법연구
2018 .06
-
‘평등강요법’의 헌법적 문제점
공법연구
2023 .02
-
입법형성의 자유와 입법재량의 남용 - 입법사실확인(legislative fact-finding)에 대한 심사를 중심으로 -
법학논집
2020 .01
-
입법교육의 개선방안에 관한 연구
입법학연구
2016 .01
-
입법과정의 개선을 통한 ‘최적화 법률’의 달성방안 연구
법이론실무연구
2022 .11
-
입법영향분석제도 및 사례 분석을 통한 새로운 방법론 구상
입법과 정책
2024 .04
-
상대적 평등으로서 평등의 의미 - 헌법재판소의 판례에 대한 비판을 중심으로 -
공법연구
2019 .12
-
미국 헌법상 성평등 지원 법제의 체계와 동향
미국헌법연구
2019 .08
-
규제혁신을 위한 입법평가제도의 개선방안 - EU와 우리나라를 중심으로 -
법조
2023 .04
-
헌법적 차원에서 장애인 평등권 보장의 재조명
법이론실무연구
2021 .08
-
소위 ‘공무직’ 근로자와 동일가치노동 동일임금 원칙
사회보장법학
2023 .06
-
미국 입법학연구를 통한 우리입법체계의 구체적 개선방안
법학논총
2021 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2021-360-001572826