지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 한국사연구회 한국사연구 韓國史硏究 제194집
- 발행연도
- 2021.9
- 수록면
- 135 - 171 (37page)
- DOI
- 10.31791/JKH.2021.09.194.135
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This study explored the background of the view of Nobi (奴婢) as a Cheonmin(天民) during the late Koryo(高麗) and the early Chosun(朝鮮) and the meaning of the double-sidedness of that view. The purpose of this research was mainly in understanding of the historical meaning of the late Koryo and the early Chosun period focusing on the view of Nobi based on neo-Confucianism(性理學).
The newly growing Sadaebu(士大夫), who witnessed the Nobi problem of late Koryo period, argued the proper treatment of Nobi and the suppression against the Nobi ’s presumptuous behaviors. Their double-sided positions on the Nobi problem can be confirmed in the public notice of Gamchalsa(監察司), which was issued in 1339, and were further embodied in the Sinjin-sadaebu’s (新進士大夫) insistence on reformation of Nobi system, resulting in the double-sided view of Nobi as a Cheonmin(天民) at the end of the Koryo.
In this context, the Nobi policy during the early Chosun period was also accompanied by a policy to treat Nobi like other commoners and to restrain Nobi ’s presumptuous behavior by establishing an order of status. In the same period, Yangban(兩班) class regarded Ki Tse(箕子)’s eight clauses law (八條法) as the origin of Dongguk Nobi(東國奴婢), and thought the existence of Nobi was helpful for the edification. The Yangban class’ perspective on Nobi could be possible because Nobi was defined as a Cheonmin, the object of edification placed below in the order of Cheonbun(天分). Therefore, the view of Nobi as a Cheonmin was the basis on which the Yangban class justified their domination of Nobi through the order of status set by the teachings of neo-Confucianism.
The will of Yangban class to establish control over Nobi sometimes conflicted with that of the state(國家) to treat them as Gongmin(公民). The circumstances in which the state and the Saga (私家) clashed over the rule of Nobi were related to the doublesidedness of the view of Nobi as a Cheonmin. The state wanted to intervene in Saga’s control of Nobi, with the view that even if it was a Sano(私奴), it should receive the same reasonable treatment as ordinary people. On the other hand, Yangban class tried to stop the state from intervening, arguing that Nobi, who are Cheonmin, should be placed under the order of status because they are subject to edification.
The newly growing Sadaebu(士大夫), who witnessed the Nobi problem of late Koryo period, argued the proper treatment of Nobi and the suppression against the Nobi ’s presumptuous behaviors. Their double-sided positions on the Nobi problem can be confirmed in the public notice of Gamchalsa(監察司), which was issued in 1339, and were further embodied in the Sinjin-sadaebu’s (新進士大夫) insistence on reformation of Nobi system, resulting in the double-sided view of Nobi as a Cheonmin(天民) at the end of the Koryo.
In this context, the Nobi policy during the early Chosun period was also accompanied by a policy to treat Nobi like other commoners and to restrain Nobi ’s presumptuous behavior by establishing an order of status. In the same period, Yangban(兩班) class regarded Ki Tse(箕子)’s eight clauses law (八條法) as the origin of Dongguk Nobi(東國奴婢), and thought the existence of Nobi was helpful for the edification. The Yangban class’ perspective on Nobi could be possible because Nobi was defined as a Cheonmin, the object of edification placed below in the order of Cheonbun(天分). Therefore, the view of Nobi as a Cheonmin was the basis on which the Yangban class justified their domination of Nobi through the order of status set by the teachings of neo-Confucianism.
The will of Yangban class to establish control over Nobi sometimes conflicted with that of the state(國家) to treat them as Gongmin(公民). The circumstances in which the state and the Saga (私家) clashed over the rule of Nobi were related to the doublesidedness of the view of Nobi as a Cheonmin. The state wanted to intervene in Saga’s control of Nobi, with the view that even if it was a Sano(私奴), it should receive the same reasonable treatment as ordinary people. On the other hand, Yangban class tried to stop the state from intervening, arguing that Nobi, who are Cheonmin, should be placed under the order of status because they are subject to edification.
목차
Ⅰ. 서언
Ⅱ. ‘노비-천민(天民)’ 인식의 성립과 그 배경
Ⅲ. 노비제 인식의 변화와 ‘동국노비지법(東國奴婢之法)’의 정당화
Ⅳ. ‘노비-천민(天民)’ 인식의 양면성과 노비 지배
Ⅴ. 결어
참고문헌
ABSTRACT
참고문헌 (98)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
동야휘집 의 구성원리와 편찬의식에 관하여-편찬의 구체적 원칙과 문학적 기획 의도를 중심으로-
한국한문학연구
2024 .04
-
복고풍 新進士大夫의 再現 - 현행 중학교 역사 교과서의 ‘신진 사대부’ 서술 검토 -
석당논총
2015 .01
-
擇里志 다시 읽기― 키워드 ‘士大夫’를 통하여
대동문화연구
2016 .01
-
조선후기 사대부의 불안정성과 남성성의 재구성 -<청백운>의 사례를 중심으로
고전문학연구
2023 .06
-
여말선초 성리학의 수용과 그 성격
역사비평
2018 .02
-
조선전기 議政府 堂下官의 구성과 운영 변화
한국사학보
2022 .08
-
조선후기 함경도 사노비의 존재양태와 국가 정책
역사와현실
2022 .09
-
고전서사에 형상화된 노비의 존재성 탐구
돈암어문학
2017 .06
-
사대부가 주도하는 사회로서의 조선시대사
역사비평
2021 .05
-
현대 성리학 연구사에서 도원(道原) 류승국(柳承國)의 위상
한국철학논집
2019 .01
-
송 · 원시기 성리학과 여성 : 사대부의 구상과 ‘여성’의 부재
역사와현실
2018 .09
-
송대 對遼 첩보조직 및 운영 연구
동양사학연구
2020 .09
-
畿湖學派의 한문 학습 차제와 체계에 대한 연구
동방한문학
2020 .01
-
武寧王妃 誌石을 통해본 백제 여성의 지위
중국고중세사연구
2016 .11
-
The Need for Confucianism
Journal of Confucian Philosophy and Culture
2021 .02
-
21세기 중국 ‘정치유학’의 이념과 쟁점
유학연구
2015 .11
-
성리학으로 조선시대를 설명하는 연구 경향의 비판적 고찰
역사비평
2019 .05
-
The Relationship between Neo-Confucianism and Korean Literature
THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES
2020 .12
-
고려말 사대부 개념의 역사성과 정치적 분화에 대한 논의
한국사상사학
2020 .01
-
姚?의 고민 톺아보기－‘桐城文派’에 대한 검토－
중국어문학
2017 .08
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0