메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
이혜리 (원광대학교)
저널정보
한국가족법학회 가족법연구 가족법연구 제34권 제3호
발행연도
2020.1
수록면
225 - 258 (34page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The following three reasons have been pointed out as the reasons for the inadequate protection of victims of child sexual abuse(hereinafter “CSA”) in the statute of limitation(hereinafter “SOL”) regulations of the civil law before modification in 2020. First, in the case of CSA, it is a mistake to make it possible to judge the starting point of the subjective SOL based on the time of recognition of the legal representative, even though the guardian or legal representative is often the perpetrator. Second, in the case of CSA, it is necessary to recognize the long-term extinctive prescription period rather than the nature of the case. Third, if both the objective starting point of the long-term extinctive prescription and the subjective starting point of the short-term extinctive prescription are applied as in the current law, the protection of victims of CSA cannot be faithful. The first concern was largely resolved by the amended Civil Code. In other words, Article 766 (3) of the amended Civil Act suspends the statute of extinctive prescription of the right to claim damages for illegal acts until the victim reaches adulthood. It was calculated from the point of adulthood and allowed to claim damages from the perpetrator within a three-year period. Next, the point that a longer period of extinctive prescription should be recognized in the case of sexual violence against children is in line with the trend of each country emphasizing the sexual protection of children. In the case of sexual violence against children, whether the long-term extinctive prescription period is specifically recognized, and if so, how long it should be decided through more research and review in the future. However, as long as the objective base point system remains, stopping the SOL until adulthood is not sufficient to protect victims of CSA, and acknowledging the long-term extinction period is not a complete solution. In the end, in the case of CSA, it is necessary to apply only the subjective starting point, excluding the objective starting point, which is applied regardless of whether the victim is recognized or not, by introducing the American discovery rule.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (27)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0