메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
김상훈 (법무법인 가온)
저널정보
한국가족법학회 가족법연구 가족법연구 제35권 제1호
발행연도
2021.1
수록면
149 - 170 (22page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Compared to the will, the trust system as the means of inheritance in Korea has not been used much due to the lack of history or publicity. However, the real reason for preventing the use of the living trust is that it cannot solve the problem regarding forced share system, nor does it have any tax benefits. Eventually, the biggest obstacles revitalizing the trust system as a new method of the property succession is the legal issues surrounding forced share and tax. However, Korean District Court decision was recently issued to the living trust that the entrusted property may not be subject to a claim of return for forced share. The court decision shocked not only the legal profession but also the socio-economic cummunity. In advance, this study explains the current status of the living trust, and look into the relationship between the living trust and the issues of the forced share. With regard to the current status of the living trust, this study introduces the first litigation case and the advisory case related. In addition, this study examines the theories and the recent court decision of whether trust assets can be included in the basic property for the calculation of forced share of heirs. In order for the trust to function properly as a new means of inheritance, it must address limitations and opacity inherent in forced share system and tax. It is hoped that the government will establish socio-economic foundation for carrying out the natural function of the trust which is a method of property succession.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (19)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0