메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
이상민 (연세대학교)
저널정보
역사학회 역사학보 歷史學報 第253輯
발행연도
2022.3
수록면
143 - 183 (41page)
DOI
10.16912/tkhr.2022.03.253.143

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This paper analyses how the Joseon government dealt with two conflicting concepts in the ruling: an ideal of realizing moral persuasion and a realistic measure of using legal punishment. As a compromise between these options, the government implemented double policies: to instruct common people about the codes and to allow reductions of sentences of some criminals. Such a measure can be called ‘Moral persuasion by legalist approaches.’
By introducing the double policy, the government expected specific outcomes: to deter crime by instructing the codes, and the criminals to be regretful for their wrongdoing by commuting the sentences. The double policy was carried out based on specific intentions. On the one hand, instructing the code was intended to direct commoners not to offend the law. In instructing ordinances, the government was benefited from local intellectuals’ cooperation during the reigns of King Taejong and King Sejong. On the other hand, allowing commutation to some criminals is intended to avoid severe punishment. The government hoped the criminals to be remorseful for their wrongdoing in the process of commutation. Previously, this kind of approach was applied only to elites. However, from the early Joseon period, the target of the approach was widened beyond the upper class.
In conclusion, the double policy reveals the Joseon government’s initiatives for harmonizing two conflicting political ideas.

목차

Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 교화 · 형정 절충과 율문 교육령 시행
Ⅲ. 관형 확대와 형률적 교화 모색
Ⅳ. 맺음말
참고문헌
Abstract

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2022-905-001148167